e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 |
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 1-11961
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0423828 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3040 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 300, Houston, TX
|
|
77056 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 332-8400
|
|
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Series G Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
(Title Of Class)
|
|
(Name of Exchange on which registered) |
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1933.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. o Large
accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-Accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $98.1 million based on the closing price of $6.05
per share on the New York Stock Exchange.
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.01 par value per share outstanding as of
February 28, 2006 was 18,485,250.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement to be delivered in connection with the 2006 annual
meeting of stockholders are incorporated in Part III of this Report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY NOTE
This annual report contains forward-looking statements of our management regarding factors
that we believe may affect our performance in the future. Such statements typically are identified
by terms expressing our future expectations or projections of revenues, earnings, earnings per
share, cash flow, market share, capital expenditures, effects of operating initiatives, gross
profit margin, debt levels, interest costs, tax benefits and other financial items. All
forward-looking statements, although made in good faith, are based on assumptions about future
events and are therefore inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ materially from those
expected or projected. Important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially
from expectations or projections include those described under the heading Forward-Looking
Statements in Item 7. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we
undertake no obligation to update or revise such statements to reflect new circumstances or
unanticipated events as they occur.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
We are a leading provider of death care services and merchandise in the United States. We
operate two types of businesses: funeral homes, which currently account for approximately 75% of
our total revenue, and cemeteries, which currently account for approximately 25% of our total
revenue. As of December 31, 2005, we operated 133 funeral homes in 28 states and 29 cemeteries in
12 states. We primarily serve suburban markets and believe we are a market leader (first or second)
in most of those markets. We provide funeral and cemetery services and products on both an
at-need (time of death) and preneed (planned prior to death) basis.
Our operations are divided into two business segments:
|
|
|
Funeral Home Operations. Funeral homes are principally service businesses that provide
burial and cremation services and sell related merchandise, such as caskets and urns. Given
the high fixed cost structure associated with funeral home operations, we believe the
following are key factors affecting our profitability: |
|
|
|
favorable demographic trends in terms of population growth and average age, which
impact death rates and number of deaths; |
|
|
|
|
establishing and maintaining leading market share positions supported by strong local heritage and relationships; |
|
|
|
|
effectively responding to increasing cremation trends by packaging complementary services and merchandise; |
|
|
|
|
controlling salary and merchandise costs; and |
|
|
|
|
exercising pricing leverage related to our at-need business to increase average revenues per contract. |
|
|
|
Cemetery Operations. Cemeteries are primarily a sales business that provides interment
rights (grave sites and mausoleums) and related merchandise, such as markers and memorials.
Our cemetery operating results are impacted by the success of our sales organization because
approximately 37% of our cemetery revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005 was
generated from preneed sales of interment rights. We believe that changes in the level of
consumer confidence (a measure of whether consumers will spend money on discretionary items)
also impact the amount of such preneed sales. Cemetery revenues generated from at-need
service and merchandise sales generally are subject to many of the same key profitability
factors as in our funeral home business. Approximately 10% of our cemetery revenues during
the year ended December 31, 2005 was attributable to investment earnings on trust funds and
finance charges on installment contracts. |
Our business strategy is based on strong, local leadership and entrepreneurial principles that
we believe drive market share, revenue growth, and profitability in our local markets. We
implemented our new funeral operating model, called Being the Best, at the beginning of 2004.
The standards based model emphasizes growing market share and improving long-term profitability by
employing leadership and entrepreneurial principles that fit the nature of our local, personal
service, high value business. This new model also requires our local and corporate leaders to
change our focus from short-term profitability to the drivers of success that create long-term
profitability and value for our shareholders. Our operating model emphasizes:
|
|
|
decentralized management of our local businesses; |
1
|
|
|
financial and operational standards based upon drivers of success of our best businesses; |
|
|
|
|
variable compensation that rewards our managers as if they are owners; |
|
|
|
|
finding, developing and retaining the best people in our industry; and |
|
|
|
|
information technology designed to support local business and corporate management
decisions, measure performance of our businesses against our financial and operational
standards, and ensure adherence to established internal control procedures. |
We believe we were successful in achieving our near-term goals in 2005 as evidenced by:
|
|
|
increasing revenues and gross profit our funeral home businesses as a result of our new operating model; |
|
|
|
|
improving our credit profile with the $130 million senior debt offering in January 2005; and |
|
|
|
|
acquiring a funeral home business that met our profile. |
Our near-term objectives for 2006 and 2007 include:
|
|
|
continuing to improve our operating and financial performance by executing our Being the
Best funeral and cemetery operating models; |
|
|
|
|
increasing our profitability and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
executing a disciplined acquisition program of funeral businesses that match a profile
based on our Being the Best standards. |
Our longer-term objectives over the next five years include:
|
|
|
continuous improvement and portfolio optimization driven by our Being the Best operating model; |
|
|
|
|
increasing market share and profitability; |
|
|
|
|
formalizing and fully implementing a disciplined acquisition program; and |
|
|
|
|
raising equity proceeds to enhance our capital structure and support our growth strategy
as appropriate opportunities arise. |
DEATH CARE INDUSTRY
Death care companies provide products and services to families in three principal areas: (i)
ceremony and tribute, generally in the form of a funeral or memorial service; (ii) disposition of
remains, either through burial or cremation; and (iii) memorialization, generally through
monuments, markers or inscriptions. The death care industry in the United States is characterized
by the following fundamental attributes (the statistics included in this report are based on public
reports from financial research firms or public websites):
Death Rates
Death rates in the United States have been relatively stable on a long-term historical basis.
The number of deaths in the United States increased at an annual rate of approximately 1% for the
period from 1980 to 2000. From 2001 to 2003, death rates deviated from this long-term trend by
declining year-over-year for a three-year period, which is the first time year-over-year declines
occurred since the mid-1970s. We understand that the death rate for 2005 increased 0.2 percent
compared to 2004 and increased 0.3 percent from 2003 to 2004. The number of deaths per year in the
United States is expected to increase from approximately 2.5 million in 2005 to 2.6 million in 2010
according to the United States Bureau of the Census. In addition, the segment of the United States
population over 65 years of age is expected to increase by over 13% from approximately 34.9 million
in 2000 to 39.6 million in 2010.
Cremation
In recent years, there has been a steady, gradual increase in the number of families in the
United States that have chosen cremation as an alternative to traditional methods of burial.
According to industry studies, cremations represented approximately 10% of the U.S. burial market
in 1980 and approximately 28% in 2003. Cremation rates can vary significantly based upon
geographic, religious
2
and cultural traditions. Historically, direct cremation has been offered as a less costly
alternative to a traditional burial. However, cremation is being increasingly accepted as part of a
package of funeral services that includes memorials, merchandise and options for the interment of
remains.
Highly Fragmented Ownership
We estimate that there are approximately 22,000 funeral homes and 10,000 cemeteries in the
United States and that the domestic funeral service industry generates approximately $15 billion of
revenue annually. The four largest public operators of both funeral homes and cemeteries in the
United States are Service Corporation International, Alderwoods Group, Stewart Enterprises, and
Carriage Services. We believe these four companies collectively represent approximately 20% of
death care revenues in the United States. Independent businesses represent the remaining amount of
industry revenue, accounting for an estimated 80% share. During most of the 1990s, there was a
trend toward independent firms consolidating with public operators. However, few acquisitions have
occurred since 1999 and there have been a number of independent entrants in local markets. As a
result, the industry continues to be characterized by a large number of locally-owned, independent
businesses.
Heritage and Tradition
Death care businesses have traditionally been family-owned businesses that have built a local
heritage and tradition through successive generations, providing a foundation for ongoing business
opportunities from established client family relationships and related referrals. Given the
sensitive nature of our business, we believe that relationships fostered at the local level build
trust in the community and are a key driver of market share. While new entrants may enter any given
market, the time and resources required to develop local heritage and tradition serve as important
barriers to entry.
Deleveraging
Until 1999, the industry experienced consolidation of independent death care businesses by a
few large, primarily publicly owned death care consolidators that sought to benefit from economies
of scale, improved managerial control, more effective operating strategies and greater financial
resources. From 2000 to 2005, these consolidators have been divesting selected properties and other
assets, and using proceeds from such dispositions, together with cash flow, to accelerate debt
reduction and build cash blances. We expect the level of dispositions to substantially decline.
Preneed Marketing
In addition to at-need sales, we and certain other death care providers sell products and
services on a preneed basis. Selling products and services on a preneed basis, if properly
executed, provides a backlog of future revenue and enhances the heritage and market share of an
established funeral home or cemetery. However, most of our preneed sales lock in the revenue from
future services at current prices and result in paying certain costs, such as sales commissions, at
the time the preneed contract is originated.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Implement Operating Initiatives
During the last five years, we and the other public consolidators have been restructuring our
organizations and improving our financial condition, liquidity and cash flow. On January 1, 2004,
we introduced our Being the Best standards, a more decentralized and entrepreneurial financial
operating model for our funeral homes. On January 1, 2006 we implemented a similar model to our
cemetery business. We believe the execution of our Being the Best standards-based funeral
operating model has resulted in operational improvements in our funeral segment. Those operational
improvements include, among other things, improved showroom presentation and merchandising,
achievement of higher prices per service and improved staffing and cost management. Key elements
of our overall business strategy include the following:
|
|
|
Decentralized Funeral Operating Model. We believe that a decentralized operating
model is best suited to grow market share and improve financial performance in the funeral
industry. This new operating model focuses on key drivers of a successful funeral business,
organized around three primary areas market share, people, and operational and financial
metrics. Successful execution of our new operating model is highly dependent on strong local
leadership, entrepreneurial empowerment and corporate support. In order to align this model
with financial performance across the organization, we developed a set of customized
standards for each funeral business based on the financial results and attributes of our
best properties, adjusting for size and percentage of cremations. Our managing partners
participate in a variable bonus plan in which they earn a percentage of their business
earnings based upon the actual standards achieved. Under this new program, we believe our
managing partners have the opportunity to be compensated at close to the same level as if
they owned the business. |
3
|
|
|
Decentralized Cemetery Operating Model. We also believe that a decentralized operating
model is best suited to grow market share and improve financial performance in the cemetery
industry. This new operating model focuses on key drivers of a successful cemetery business,
similarly organized around three primary areas market share, people, and operational and
financial metrics. A principal initiative is to emphasize property sales, which strengthen
the ties between our cemeteries and these clients. Successful execution of our new operating
model is highly dependent on strong local leadership, entrepreneurial empowerment and
corporate support. In order to align this model with financial performance across the
organization, we developed a set of standards for all of our cemeteries based on the
financial results and attributes of the best of these businesses. Our managing partners
participate in a variable bonus plan in which they earn a percentage of their business
earnings based upon the actual standards achieved. Under this new program, we believe our
managing partners have the opportunity to be compensated at close to the same level as if
they owned the business. |
|
|
|
|
Presentation and Packaging of Services and Merchandise. We believe packaging funeral
services and merchandise offers both simplicity and convenience for our client families.
Well-conceived and thoughtful packages eliminate much of the effort and discomfort
experienced by client families concerning matters about which they do not have much
knowledge during a very stressful and emotional time. We have entered into updated
arrangements with four primary casket suppliers to support our strategy and control
wholesale costs. We also anticipate that our packaging strategy will result in increased
revenue per cremation service over time as more families select packages that provide
services and merchandise. The percentages of funeral services conducted by us in which
cremation was chosen as the manner in which to dispose of remains was 31% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and 33% for the year ended December 31, 2005. For the year ended December
31, 2005, approximately 63% of the number of our total cremation services were direct
cremations (where no viewing, visitation, or merchandise is involved, although a memorial
service may be held) and 37% included additional services and merchandise. |
|
|
|
|
Preneed Funeral Sales Program. We operate under a local, decentralized preneed sales
strategy whereby each business location customizes its preneed program to its local needs.
We emphasize insurance-funded contracts over trusted contracts in most markets, as insurance
products allow us to earn commission income to improve our cash flow and offset a
significant amount of the up-front costs associated with preneed sales. In addition, the
cash flow and earnings from insurance contracts are more stable than traditional trust fund
investments. In markets that depend on preneed sales for market share, we supplement the
arrangements written by funeral directors with sales sourced by sales counselors and third
party sellers. |
|
|
|
|
Systems and Support Enhancements. We periodically perform targeted reviews of our
systems and support services with the objective of improving effectiveness and streamlining
processes. We recently completed an upgrade of our funeral services system to improve its
features and functions and implemented a cemetery system during 2005. We will continue to
review and change corporate processes to improve efficiency and effectiveness. |
|
|
|
|
Renewed Corporate Development Efforts. We believe that our improved capital
structure, resulting in part from the $130 million offering in January 2005 of senior debt
due in 2015 and which bears interest at 7.785% per annum, positions us to pursue a strategy
of disciplined growth, affording us the flexibility to redeploy our cash flow toward
selective acquisitions that meet our criteria. We expect to continue to improve our credit
profile as we invest our cash flow into businesses that will contribute incremental
revenues, earnings and cash flow. We will be applying the standards and practices
established under our Being the Best operating model to qualify acquisition candidates,
ensuring that they are a proper fit and can be readily integrated into our portfolio. Ideal
candidates would be those that are demonstrated market leaders, have strong local
management, have owners and family members whose objectives are aligned with ours, and have
field-level operating margins consistent with our best performing properties. We will look
to geographic areas that complement our existing markets, with a primary focus on suburban
markets with growing populations of 100,000 or more, preferably in the Northeast and on the
West Coast. We expect to give the most serious consideration to firms with at least 300
calls annually (or at least $1.5 million in annual revenue). |
OUR STRENGTHS
Market Leader in Our Suburban and Rural Markets. We are the fourth largest publicly traded
death care company in the United States. Our operations are located in suburban and rural markets,
where we primarily compete with smaller, independent operators with significantly less financial
and managerial resources. Most of our suburban markets have populations of 100,000 or more. In over
70% of our funeral home markets, we believe that we are either first or second in local market
share.
Partnership Culture. Our funeral homes and cemeteries are managed by individuals with
extensive death care experience, often within their local markets. Our funeral home managing
partners have responsibility for day-to-day operations but are required to follow our Being the
Best operating and financial standards. This strategy allows each local business to maintain its
unique identity within its local market and to capitalize on its reputation and heritage while our
senior management maintains supervisory controls and provides support services from our corporate
headquarters. We believe our culture will be very attractive to owners of premier
4
independent businesses that fit our profile of suitable acquisition candidates.
Flexible Capital Structure. In January 2005, we met our goal of reaccessing the capital
markets by completing our $130 million senior debt offering. We used the net proceeds to pay off
the existing senior debt that had near term maturities and accrued interest on our TIDES (described
below). This transaction eliminated all near-term debt maturity issues. We believe that our
capital structure provides us with financial flexibility, which allows us to focus our efforts on
improving operations and growing the Company. After completion of the offering, we have four
primary components in our capital structure:
|
|
|
the $130 million senior notes issued in January 2005 which have a 2015 maturity; |
|
|
|
|
a revolving credit facility, described under the heading Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7; |
|
|
|
|
our convertible junior subordinated debenture payable to our affiliate trust, which has
the ability to defer payments of interest, and a 2029 maturity (our TIDES); and |
|
|
|
|
our common stock. |
Stable Cash Flow. Since 2000, we have demonstrated the ability to generate stable cash flow.
Prior to 2005, our primary use of cash flow was to repay debt. We have also demonstrated an ability
to manage capital expenditures to a consistent level. Adjusted cash flow (cash flow from operations
less special charges and capital expenditures) for 2005 totaled $9.7 million. We intend to use
cash flow to fund a selective growth strategy. Our growth strategy is the primary way we expect to
increase shareholder value, which means that we need to achieve a much higher return on invested
capital during this growth cycle compared to the 90s cycle. We will reassess our capital
allocation strategy annually, but at this point we believe that our financial goals will best be
achieved by continuing to improve the operating and financial performance of our existing portfolio
while selectively making new acquisitions.
Strong Field-Level Operating Margins. We believe that our field-level operating margins are
among the highest reported by the public companies in the death care industry and that this
performance is a testament to the success of our business strategies. These strong margins and the
ability to control costs are important advantages in a business such as ours that is characterized
by a high fixed-cost structure. We will continue to seek ways to improve our financial performance,
and we believe that our standards-based operating model implemented at the beginning of 2005 will
continue to yield positive improvement in our financial results.
Effective Management of Funeral Preneed Sales. We believe our local, decentralized strategy
allows us to adapt our preneed sales selectively to best address the competitive situation in our
markets. In highly competitive markets, we execute a more aggressive preneed sales program. In less
competitive markets where we have a strong market position, we deploy a more passive preneed sales
program. In certain of our markets, we do not deploy a formal preneed program. This approach allows
us to target the investment in preneed sales to markets where we have the opportunity to reinforce
our market share. Because approximately 80% of our revenues are generated from at-need sales, we
retain significant pricing leverage in our funeral business.
Integrated Information Systems. We have implemented information systems to support local
business decisions and to monitor performance of our businesses compared to financial and
performance standards. All of our funeral homes and cemeteries are connected to our corporate
headquarters, which allows us to monitor and assess critical operating and financial data in order
to analyze the performance of individual locations on a timely basis. Furthermore, our information
system infrastructure provides senior management with a critical tool for monitoring and adhering
to our established internal controls, which is critical given our decentralized model and the
sensitive nature of our business operations.
Proven Management Team. Our management team, headed by Company founder Mel Payne, is
characterized by a dynamic culture that reacts quickly and proactively to address changing market
conditions and emerging trends. We believe this culture has been critical to our successful recent
efforts and will provide an important advantage as the death care industry evolves. We are
committed to continue operating an efficient corporate organization and strengthening our corporate
and local business leadership. We believe that our Being the Best operating model will ensure this
commitment at all levels of the organization. At year-end 2005 we reorganized our funeral and
cemetery divisions into four Regions, each headed by a Regional Partner. This change should
engender more cooperation and synergy between our funeral and cemetery operations and support the
goal of market-share and volume growth in our most significant markets. The four Regional Partners
will report to Mel Payne in the role of Chief Operating Officer.
OPERATIONS
We conduct our funeral and cemetery operations only in the United States. Our operations are
divided into two segments: funeral operations and cemetery operations. Information for each of our
segments is presented below and in our financial statements set forth herein.
5
Funeral Home Operations
At December 31, 2005, we operated 133 funeral homes in 28 states. Funeral home revenues
currently account for approximately 75% of our total revenues. The funeral home operations are
managed by a team of experienced death care industry professionals and selected region-level
individuals with substantial management experience in service industries. See Note 20 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, for segment data related to
funeral home operations.
Our funeral homes offer a complete range of services to meet a familys funeral needs,
including consultation, the removal and preparation of remains, the sale of caskets and related
funeral merchandise, the use of funeral home facilities for visitation and worship, and
transportation services. Most of our funeral homes have a non-denominational chapel on the
premises, which permits family visitation and religious services to take place at one location and
thereby reduces our transportation costs and inconvenience to the family.
Funeral homes are principally a service business that provides burial and cremation services
and sells related merchandise, such as caskets and urns. Given the high fixed cost structure
associated with funeral home operations, we believe the following are key factors affecting our
profitability:
|
|
|
favorable demographic trends in terms of population growth and average age, which
impact death rates and number of deaths; |
|
|
|
|
leading market share positions supported by strong local heritage and relationships; |
|
|
|
|
effectively responding to increasing cremation trends by packaging complementary
services and merchandise; |
|
|
|
|
controlling salary and merchandise costs; and |
|
|
|
|
exercising pricing leverage related to our at-need business to increase average
revenues per contract. |
Cemetery Operations
As of December 31, 2005, we operated 29 cemeteries in 12 states. The cemetery operations are
managed by a team of experienced death care industry and sales professionals. Cemetery revenues
currently account for approximately 25% of our total revenues. See Note 20 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, for segment data related to cemetery
operations.
Our cemetery products and services include interment services, the rights to interment in
cemetery sites (including grave sites, mausoleum crypts and niches) and related cemetery
merchandise such as memorials and vaults. Cemetery operations generate revenues through sales of
interment rights and memorials, installation fees, fees for interment and cremation services,
finance charges from installment sales contracts and investment income from preneed cemetery
merchandise and perpetual care trusts.
Our cemetery operating results are impacted by the success of our sales organization because
approximately 37% of our cemetery revenues was generated from preneed sales of interment rights
during the year ended December 31, 2005. An additional 19% of our 2005 cemetery revenues was from
deliveries of merchandise and services previously sold on preneed contracts. We believe that
changes in the level of consumer confidence (a measure of whether consumers will spend money on
discretionary items) also impact the amount of such preneed sales. Cemetery revenues generated from
at-need services and merchandise sales generally are subject to many of the same key profitability
factors as in our funeral home business. Approximately 10% of our cemetery revenues was
attributable to investment earnings on trust funds and finance charges on installment contracts
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Preneed Programs
In addition to sales of funeral merchandise and services, cemetery interment rights and
cemetery merchandise and services at the time of need, we also market funeral and cemetery services
and products on a preneed basis. Preneed funeral or cemetery contracts enable families to
establish, in advance, the type of service to be performed, the products to be used and the cost of
such products and services. Preneed contracts permit families to eliminate issues of making death
care plans at the time of need and allow input from other family members before the death occurs.
Preneed funeral contracts are usually paid on an installment basis. The performance of preneed
funeral contracts is usually secured by placing the funds collected in trust for the benefit of the
customer or by the purchase of a life insurance policy, the proceeds of which will pay for such
services at the time of need. Insurance policies, intended to fund preneed funeral contracts, cover
6
the original contract price and generally include an element of growth (earnings) designed to
offset future inflationary cost increases. Revenue from preneed funeral contracts, along with
accumulated earnings, are not recognized until the time the funeral service is performed. The
commission income is recognized as revenue when the period of refund expires (generally one year),
which helps us defray the costs we incur to originate the preneed contract (primarily commissions
we pay to our sales counselors). Additionally, we generally earn a commission from the insurance
company from the sale of insurance-funded policies. Prior to 2005, the direct marketing commissions
and costs incurred from the sale of preneed funeral contracts were deferred and amortized on an
actuarial method to match the expected maturity of the preneed contracts. Effective January 1,
2005, the Company changed its method for accounting for deferred obtaining costs and began
expensing all costs as incurred. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year
ended December 31, 2005, for more detailed discussion of the Companys accounting change.
In addition to preneed funeral contracts, we also offer preplanned funeral arrangements
whereby a client determines in advance substantially all of the details of a funeral service
without any financial commitment or other obligation on the part of the client until the actual
time of need. Preplanned funeral arrangements permit a family to avoid issues of making death care
plans at the time of need and enable a funeral home to establish relationships with a client that
may eventually lead to an at-need sale.
Preneed sales of cemetery interment rights are usually financed through interest-bearing
installment sales contracts, generally with terms of up to five years. In substantially all cases,
we receive an initial down payment at the time the contract is signed. The interest rates generally
range between 12% and 14%. Preneed sales of cemetery interment rights are generally recorded as
revenue when 10% of the contract amount related to the interment right has been collected.
Merchandise and services may similarly be sold on an installment basis, but revenue is recorded
when delivery has occurred. Allowances for customer cancellations and refunds are recorded at the
date that the contract is executed and periodically evaluated thereafter based upon historical
experience.
Carriage sold 4,936 and 4,877 preneed funeral contracts during the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2005, respectively. At December 31, 2005, we had a backlog of 58,531 preneed funeral
contracts to be delivered in the future. Approximately 20% of the funeral revenues recognized
during each of the last three years and during the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 originated
through preneed contracts. Cemetery revenues that originated from preneed contracts represented
approximately 50% and 55% of Carriages net cemetery revenues for both 2004 and 2005, respectively.
As of December 31, 2005, we employed a staff of 220 advance-planning and family service
representatives for the sale of preneed products and services.
TRUST FUNDS AND INSURANCE CONTRACTS
We have established a variety of trusts in connection with our funeral home and cemetery
operations as required under applicable state law. Such trusts include (i) preneed funeral trusts;
(ii) preneed cemetery merchandise and service trusts; and (iii) perpetual care trusts. These trusts
are typically administered by independent financial institutions selected by us. We also use
independent financial advisors for investment management and advisory services.
Preneed funeral sales generally require deposits to a trust or purchase of a third-party
insurance product. The trust fund income earned and any increase in insurance benefits are deferred
until the service is performed, in order to offset possible inflation in cost when providing the
service in the future. The trust funds and deferred revenue are reflected on Carriages balance
sheet. In most states, we are not permitted to withdraw principal or investment income from such
trusts until the funeral service is performed. Some states, however, allow for the retention of a
percentage (generally 10%) of the receipts to offset any administrative and selling expenses, which
we defer until the service is provided. The aggregate balance of our preneed funeral contracts held
in trust, insurance contracts and receivables from customers was approximately $272.3 million as of
December 31, 2005.
We are generally required under applicable state laws to deposit a specified amount (which
varies from state to state, generally 50% to 100% of selling price) into a merchandise and service
trust fund for cemetery merchandise and services preneed sales. The related trust fund income
earned is recognized when the related merchandise and services are delivered. We are generally
permitted to withdraw the trust principal and the accrued income when the merchandise is purchased,
when service is provided by us or when the contract is cancelled. The merchandise and service trust
fund balances, in the aggregate, totaled approximately $54.8 million as of December 31, 2005.
In most states, regulations require a portion (generally 10%) of the sale amount of cemetery
property and memorials to be placed in a perpetual care trust. The income from these perpetual care
trusts provides the funds necessary to maintain cemetery property and memorials in perpetuity. The
trust fund income is recognized, as earned, in cemetery revenues. While we are entitled to withdraw
the income from our perpetual care trust to provide for the maintenance of the cemetery property
and memorials, we are not entitled to withdraw any of the principal balance of the trust fund. The
perpetual care trust balances totaled approximately $32.4 million at December 31, 2005.
7
For additional information with respect to our trusts, see Note 6, 7 and 8 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.
COMPETITION
The operating environment in the death care industry has been highly competitive. Publicly
traded companies operating in the United States are Service Corporation International, Alderwoods
Group, Stewart Enterprises, Keystone North America and StoneMor Partners. In addition, a number of
smaller, non-public companies have been active in acquiring and operating funeral homes and
cemeteries.
Our funeral home and cemetery operations usually face competition in the markets that they
serve. Our primary competition in most of our markets is from local independent operators. We have
observed an increase in new start-up competition in certain areas of the country, which in any one
market may have impacted our profitability because of the high fixed cost nature of funeral homes.
Market share for funeral homes and cemeteries is largely a function of reputation and heritage,
although competitive pricing, professional service and attractive, well-maintained and conveniently
located facilities are also important. Because of the importance of reputation and heritage, market
share increases are usually gained over a long period of time. The sale of preneed funeral services
and cemetery property has increasingly been used by many companies as a marketing tool to build
market share.
There has been increasing competition from providers specializing in specific services, such
as cremations, who offer minimal service and low-end pricing. We also face competition from
companies that market products and related information over the Internet and non-traditional casket
stores in certain markets. We have experienced relatively limited impact in our specific markets
from these competitors to date.
REGULATION
Our funeral home operations are subject to substantial regulation by the Federal Trade
Commission ( the FTC), as well as other federal, state and local agencies. Certain regulations
contain minimum standards for funeral industry practices, require extensive price and other
affirmative disclosures to the customer at the time of sale and impose mandatory itemization
requirements for the sale of funeral products and services. The FTC has been reviewing the Trade
Rule on Funeral Industry Practices (the Funeral Rule), which defines certain acts or practices as
unfair or deceptive and contains certain requirements to prevent these acts or practices. At this
time, the FTC has not proposed changes to the regulation. We believe we are in substantial
compliance with the Funeral Rule.
We are subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
and comparable state statutes. The OSHA hazard communication standard, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the federal
Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and similar state statutes require us to organize
information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations. Certain of this
information must be provided to employees, state and local governmental authorities and local
citizens.
Our operations, including our preneed sales activities and the management and administration
of preneed trust funds, are also subject to regulation, supervision and licensing under state laws
and regulations. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all such laws and
regulations.
In accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, we submitted a Section 12(a) CEO
Certification in 2005, which was not qualified in any manner. In addition, in accordance with the
rules, attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are our CEO and CFO certifications as required by Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2005, we and our subsidiaries employed 1,781 employees, of whom 935 were
full-time and 846 part-time. All of our funeral directors and embalmers possess licenses required
by applicable regulatory agencies. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
Approximately ten of our employees in Nevada have elected to have the local teamsters union
represent them in contract negotiations with the Company. To date, the Company has not entered
into any contracts with the union.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our website address is www.carriageservices.com. Available on this website under Investor
Relations-Investor Relations Menu SEC Filings, free of charge, are Carriages annual reports on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, insider reports on Forms 3,
4 and 5 filed on behalf of directors and officers and amendments to those reports as soon as
8
reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Also posted on our website, and available in print upon request, are charters for the
Companys Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of the
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are also posted on the
Companys website under the Corporate Governance section. Within the time period required by the
SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the Company will post on its website any modifications
to the Codes and any waivers applicable to senior officers as defined in the applicable Code, as
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
Marketing and sales activities by existing and new competitors could cause us to lose market share
and lead to lower revenues and margins.
We face competition in all of our markets. Most of our competitors are independently owned,
and some are relatively recent market entrants. Certain of the recent entrants are individuals who
were formerly employed by us or by our competitors and have relationships and name recognition
within our markets. As a group, independent competitors tend to be aggressive in distinguishing
themselves by their independent ownership, and they promote their independence through advertising,
direct mailings and personal contact. Increasing pressures from new market entrants and continued
advertising and marketing by competitors in local markets could cause us to lose market share and
revenues. In addition, competitors may change the types or mix of products or services offered.
These changes may attract customers, causing us to lose market share and revenue as well as to
incur costs in response to competition to vary the types or mix of products or services offered by
us.
Our ability to generate preneed sales depends on a number of factors, including sales incentives
and local and general economic conditions.
Declines in preneed sales would reduce our backlog and revenue and could reduce our future
market share. On the other hand, a significant increase in preneed sales can have a negative impact
on cash flow as a result of commissions and other costs incurred without corresponding revenues.
As we have localized our preneed sales strategies, we are continuing to refine the mix of
service and product offerings in both our funeral and cemetery segments, including changes in our
sales commission and incentive structure. These changes could cause us to experience declines in
preneed sales in the short-run. In addition, economic conditions at the local or national level
could cause declines in preneed sales either as a result of less discretionary income or lower
consumer confidence. Declines in preneed cemetery property sales would reduce current revenue, and
declines in other preneed sales would reduce our backlog and future revenue and could reduce future
market share.
Preneed sales of cemetery property and funeral and cemetery merchandise and services are
generally cash flow negative initially, primarily due to the commissions paid on the sale, the
portion of the sales proceeds required to be placed into trust or escrow and the terms of the
particular contract such as the size of the down payment required and the length of the contract.
As a result, preneed sales reduce cash flow available for other activities, and, to the extent
preneed activities are increased, cash flow will be further reduced.
Price competition could also reduce our market share or cause us to reduce prices to retain or
recapture market share, either of which could reduce revenues and margins.
We have historically experienced price competition primarily from independent funeral home and
cemetery operators, and from monument dealers, casket retailers, low-cost funeral providers and
other non-traditional providers of services or products. New market entrants tend to attempt to
build market share by offering lower cost alternatives. In the past, this price competition has
resulted in our losing market share in some markets. In other markets, we have had to reduce prices
thereby reducing profit margins in order to retain or recapture market share. Increased price
competition in the future could further reduce revenues, profit margins and our backlog.
Our ability to execute our growth strategy is highly dependent upon our ability to successfully
identify suitable acquisition candidates and negotiate transactions on favorable terms.
There has been little acquisition activity by us or the other public companies in the death
care industry over the preceding five years, and there is no assurance that we will be able to
identify candidates that meet our criteria or that we will be able to reach terms with identified
candidates for transactions that are acceptable to us. We intend to apply standards established
under our Being the
9
Best operating model in qualifying acquisition candidates, and there is no assurance that we
will be successful in doing so or that we will find attractive candidates that satisfy these
standards.
Increased or unanticipated costs, such as insurance, taxes, new computer systems implementations
and the cost of complying with Sarbanes-Oxley, may have a negative impact on our earnings and cash
flows.
We have experienced material increases in certain costs during the previous two years, such as
documenting and testing our internal controls to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley and implementing
computer systems. We will incur costs in these two areas and others in 2006, which costs can only
be estimated. These types of cost increases may impair our ability to achieve revenue growth that
exceeds our cost increases. Our 2006 plan assumes that we will be successful in increasing revenues
at a rate that is greater than the growth in the cost of sales. We can give no assurance that we
will be successful in achieving such increases.
Improved performance in our funeral segment is highly dependent upon successful execution of our
standards-based Being the Best operating model.
At the beginning of 2004, we implemented our new standards-based Being the Best operating
model to improve and better measure performance in our funeral operations. We developed standards
according to nine criteria, each with a different weighting, designed around market share, people,
and operational and financial metrics. We also incentivise our location managing partners by giving
them the opportunity to earn a fixed percentage of the field-level earnings before interest taxes,
depreciation and amortization based upon the number and weighting of the standards achieved. Our
expectation is that, over time, the Being the Best operating model will result in our maintaining
or improving field-level margins, market share, customer satisfaction and overall financial
performance, but there is no assurance that these goals will be met.
Earnings from and principal of trust funds and insurance contracts could be reduced by changes in
financial markets and the mix of securities owned.
Earnings and investment gains and losses on trust funds and insurance contracts are affected
by financial market conditions and the mix of fixed-income and equity securities that we choose to
maintain in the funds. During 2004 and 2005, we revised the mix of investments within the cemetery
trusts according to our new asset allocation model in an effort to increase earnings and lower
volatility. We expect to make similar changes in the funeral trusts in 2006. We may not choose the
optimal mix for any particular market condition. Declines in earnings from perpetual care trust
funds would cause a decline in current revenues, while declines in earnings from other trust funds
could cause a decline in future cash flows and revenues.
Covenant restrictions under our debt instruments may limit our flexibility in operating our
business.
The terms of our credit facility and the indenture governing the Senior Notes may limit our
ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make distributions or redeem or repurchase stock; |
|
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
|
grant liens; |
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
enter into sale-leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
|
sell assets; and |
|
|
|
|
acquire the assets of, or merge or consolidate with, other companies. |
Our credit facility also requires us to maintain certain financial ratios. Complying with
these restrictive covenants and financial ratios, as well as those that may be contained in any
future debt agreements, may impair our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or
to take advantage of other favorable business opportunities. Our ability to comply with these
restrictive covenants and financial ratios will depend on our future performance, which may be
affected by events beyond our control. Our failure to
10
comply with any of these covenants or restrictions when they apply will result in a default
under the particular debt instrument, which could permit acceleration of the debt under that
instrument and, in some cases, the acceleration of debt under other instruments that contain
cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions. In the event of an event of default, or in the
event of a cross-default or cross-acceleration, we may not have sufficient funds available to make
the required payments under our debt instruments. If we are unable to repay amounts owed under the
terms of our amended senior secured credit facility, the lenders thereunder may be entitled to sell
certain of our funeral assets to satisfy our obligations under the agreement.
RISKS RELATED TO THE DEATH CARE INDUSTRY
Declines in the number of deaths in our markets can cause a decrease in revenues. Changes in the
number of deaths are not predictable from market to market or over the short term.
Declines in the number of deaths could cause at-need sales of funeral and cemetery services,
property and merchandise to decline, which could decrease revenues. Although the United States
Bureau of the Census estimates that the number of deaths in the United States will increase through
2010, longer life spans could reduce the rate of deaths. In addition, changes in the number of
deaths can vary among local markets and from quarter to quarter, and variations in the number of
deaths in our markets or from quarter to quarter are not predictable. These variations may cause
our revenues to fluctuate and our results of operations to lack predictability.
The increasing number of cremations in the United States could cause revenues to decline because we
could lose market share to firms specializing in cremations. In addition, direct cremations produce
no revenues for cemetery operations and lower funeral revenues.
Our traditional cemetery and funeral service operations face competition from the increasing
number of cremations in the United States. Industry studies indicate that the percentage of
cremations has steadily increased and that cremations will represent approximately 35% of the U.S.
burial market by the year 2010, compared to approximately 28% in 2003. The trend toward cremation
could cause cemeteries and traditional funeral homes to lose market share and revenues to firms
specializing in cremations. In addition, direct cremations (with no funeral service, casket, urn,
mausoleum niche, columbarium niche or burial) produce no revenues for cemetery operations and lower
revenues than traditional funerals and, when delivered at a traditional funeral home, produce lower
profit margins as well.
If we are not able to respond effectively to changing consumer preferences, our market share,
revenues and profitability could decrease.
Future market share, revenues and profits will depend in part on our ability to anticipate,
identify and respond to changing consumer preferences. During the last five years, we have
implemented new product and service strategies based on results of customer surveys that we conduct
on a continuous basis. However, we may not correctly anticipate or identify trends in consumer
preferences, or we may identify them later than our competitors do. In addition, any strategies we
may implement to address these trends may prove incorrect or ineffective.
Because the funeral and cemetery businesses are high fixed-cost businesses, changes in revenue can
have a disproportionately large effect on cash flow and profits.
Companies in the funeral home and cemetery business must incur many of the costs of operating
and maintaining facilities, land and equipment regardless of the level of sales in any given
period. For example, we must pay salaries, utilities, property taxes and maintenance costs on
funeral homes and maintain the grounds of cemeteries regardless of the number of funeral services
or interments performed. Because we cannot decrease these costs significantly or rapidly when we
experience declines in sales, declines in sales can cause margins, profits and cash flow to decline
at a greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Changes or increases in, or failure to comply with, regulations applicable to our business could
increase costs or decrease cash flows.
The death care industry is subject to extensive regulation and licensing requirements under
federal, state and local laws. For example, the funeral home industry is regulated by the Federal
Trade Commission, which requires funeral homes to take actions designed to protect consumers. State
laws impose licensing requirements and regulate preneed sales. Embalming and cremation facilities
are subject to stringent environmental and health regulations. Compliance with these regulations is
burdensome, and we are always at risk of not complying with the regulations or facing costly and
burdensome investigations from regulatory authorities.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose to amend or add regulations,
which could increase costs or decrease cash flows. For example, federal, state, local and other
regulatory agencies have considered and may enact additional
11
legislation or regulations that could affect the death care industry. Several states and
regulatory agencies have considered or are considering regulations that could require more liberal
refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of products and services, limit or eliminate our
ability to use surety bonding, increase trust requirements and prohibit the common ownership of
funeral homes and cemeteries in the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible proposals could have a material adverse
effect on us, our financial condition, our results of operations and our future prospects. For
additional information regarding the regulation of the death care industry, see Business
Regulation.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
At December 31, 2005, we operated 133 funeral homes in 28 states and 29 cemeteries in 12
states. Carriage owns the real estate and buildings for 80% of our funeral homes and leases
facilities for the remaining 20%. Carriage owns 24 cemeteries and operates five cemeteries under
long-term contracts with municipalities and non-profit organizations at December 31, 2005. Ten
funeral homes are operated in combination with cemeteries as these locations are physically located
on the same property or very close proximity and under same management . The 29 cemeteries operated
by Carriage have an inventory of unsold developed lots totaling approximately 115,000 and 106,000
at December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. In addition, approximately 609 acres are available for
future development. We anticipate having a sufficient inventory of lots to maintain our property
sales for the foreseeable future. The specialized nature of our business requires that our
facilities be well-maintained. Management believes this standard is met.
12
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2005, regarding
Carriages properties used by the funeral homes segment and by the cemeteries segment identified by
state:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Funeral Homes |
|
Number of Cemeteries |
State |
|
Owned |
|
Leased(1) |
|
Owned |
|
Managed |
California |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Florida
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Georgia
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Idaho
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Illinois
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Indiana
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Iowa
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Kansas
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Maryland
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Michigan
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Missouri
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Montana
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Nevada
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New
Jersey
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
New
Mexico
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
New
York
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
North
Carolina
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Ohio
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Rhode
Island
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Texas
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Virginia
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Washington
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
West
Virginia
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The leases, with respect to these funeral homes, have remaining terms ranging from one
to fifteen years, and, generally, we have the right to renew past the initial terms and a
right of first refusal on any proposed sale of the property where these funeral homes are
located. |
Carriages corporate headquarters occupy approximately 37,000 square feet of leased office
space in Houston, Texas. At December 31, 2005, we operated 560 vehicles, of which 557 are owned and
3 are leased.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Carriage and our subsidiaries are parties to a number of legal proceedings that arise from
time to time in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, we do not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on the
financial statements.
We carry insurance with coverage and coverage limits consistent with our assessment of risks
in our business and of an acceptable level of financial exposure. Although there can be no
assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to mitigate all damages, claims or contingencies,
we believe that our insurance provides reasonable coverage for known asserted or unasserted claims.
In the event the Company sustained a loss from a claim and the insurance carrier disputed coverage
or coverage limits, the Company may record a charge in a different period than the recovery, if
any, from the insurance carrier.
13
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Carriages Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CSV. The
following table presents the quarterly high and low sale prices as reported by the New York Stock
Exchange:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
6.30 |
|
|
$ |
5.20 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
$ |
3.20 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
4.10 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
3.64 |
|
|
$ |
2.99 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
3.75 |
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
As of February 28, 2006, there were 18,485,250 shares of Carriages Common Stock outstanding.
The Common Stock shares outstanding are held by approximately 300 stockholders of record. Each
share is entitled to one vote on matters requiring the vote of stockholders. We believe there are
approximately 5,000 beneficial owners of the Common Stock.
We have never paid a cash dividend on our Common Stock. Carriage currently intends to retain
earnings to fund the growth and development of our business. Any future change in our policy will
be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors in light of the financial condition, capital
requirements, earnings prospects of Carriage and any limitations imposed by lenders or investors,
as well as other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
We have a compensation policy for fees paid to its directors under which our nonemployee
directors may choose to receive director compensation fees either in the form of cash or common
stock based on the fair market value of our common stock based on the closing price published by
the New York Stock Exchange on the date the fees are earned. We issued 13,709 shares of its common
stock to the directors who elected to receive their 2005 fees in common stock. No underwriter was
used in connection with this issuance. We relied on the Section 4(2) exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended.
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities in the fourth quarter of the year ended
December 31, 2005.
14
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial information for Carriage that
has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Carriage as of and for each
of the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. These historical results are
neither indicative of our future performance, nor necessarily comparable as a result of a change in
accounting methods discussed below.
Our historical financial data included in the table below as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2001 is derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements audited by Arthur Andersen
LLP, independent public accountants, which has ceased operations. The historical financial data
included in the table below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 is
derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements audited by KPMG LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm.
We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46, as revised (FIN 46R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, as of March 31,
2004. The adoption of FIN 46R resulted in the consolidation of funeral and cemetery merchandise and
service, and perpetual care trusts in our consolidated balance sheet at fair value. We do not
consolidate certain funeral trusts for which we do not absorb a majority of their expected losses
and, therefore, are not considered a primary beneficiary of these funeral trusts under FIN 46R. The
adoption of FIN 46R also resulted in the deconsolidation of Carriage Services Capital Trust, the
issuer of TIDES preferred securities. Instead, we now report as a liability the junior subordinated
debenture payable to the Trust. Amounts and balances prior to March 31, 2004 have not been restated
to reflect the adoption of FIN 46R.
We adopted Statement of Financial Accountings Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144) during 2004. The application of that
standard resulted in, among other things, the presentation of the revenues and expenses, as well as
gains, losses and impairments, from business units sold, discontinued or held for sale in the
discontinued operations section of the consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented.
The Company changed its method of accounting for deferred obtaining costs, which are preneed
selling costs incurred for the origination of prearranged funeral and cemetery service and
merchandise sales contracts, effective January 1, 2005. The change affects the comparability of
the operating results in the following table. Prior to this change, commissions and other direct
selling costs related to originating preneed funeral and cemetery service and merchandise sales
contracts were deferred and amortized with the objective of recognizing the selling costs in the
same period that the related revenue is recognized. Under the new accounting method, the
commissions and other direct selling costs, which are current obligations are paid and use
operating cash flow, are expensed as incurred. The Companys results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005 is reported on the basis of our changed method, but the periods prior to
2005 are reported using the prior accounting method. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.
You should read this historical financial data together with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this report and Carriages
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share and operating data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
119,543 |
|
|
$ |
114,631 |
|
|
$ |
112,209 |
|
|
$ |
112,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,072 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
37,245 |
|
|
|
34,217 |
|
|
|
34,351 |
|
|
|
37,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
156,788 |
|
|
|
148,848 |
|
|
|
146,560 |
|
|
|
149,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
30,423 |
|
|
|
33,250 |
|
|
|
29,084 |
|
|
|
29,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,410 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
|
8,222 |
|
|
|
8,521 |
|
|
|
8,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
|
38,858 |
|
|
|
41,472 |
|
|
|
37,605 |
|
|
|
38,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,265 |
|
General and administrative
expenses |
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
10,557 |
|
|
|
10,492 |
|
|
|
10,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,383 |
|
Other charges
(income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
30,160 |
|
|
|
30,044 |
|
|
|
26,681 |
|
|
|
27,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,704 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(20,266 |
) |
|
|
(19,679 |
) |
|
|
(17,900 |
) |
|
|
(17,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,711 |
) |
Additional interest and other costs of
senior debt refinancing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,933 |
) |
Other income
(expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income
taxes |
|
|
9,894 |
|
|
|
11,230 |
|
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
11,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
(Provision) benefit for income
taxes |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
(3,539 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
|
7,915 |
|
|
|
19,705 |
|
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
936 |
|
Cumulative effect of the change in
accounting, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
9,002 |
|
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
6,625 |
|
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,865 |
) |
Preferred stock
dividends |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
8,965 |
|
|
$ |
20,278 |
|
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued
operations |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of the change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per
share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued
operations |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of the change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per
share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
16,973 |
|
|
|
17,444 |
|
|
|
17,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
17,492 |
|
|
|
17,433 |
|
|
|
17,808 |
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral homes at end of
period |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Cemeteries at end of period |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Funeral services performed |
|
|
24,818 |
|
|
|
23,990 |
|
|
|
23,323 |
|
|
|
22,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,792 |
|
Preneed funeral contracts
sold |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
5,174 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,877 |
|
Backlog of preneed funeral
contracts |
|
|
67,099 |
|
|
|
59,412 |
|
|
|
59,696 |
|
|
|
60,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,531 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
15,679 |
|
|
$ |
9,526 |
|
|
$ |
9,934 |
|
|
$ |
10,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
552,167 |
|
|
$ |
549,948 |
|
|
$ |
538,917 |
|
|
$ |
565,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
570,640 |
|
Working capital (deficit) |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
(14,285 |
) |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,915 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current
maturities |
|
|
148,508 |
|
|
|
141,207 |
|
|
|
105,355 |
|
|
|
102,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,572 |
|
Convertible junior subordinated
debenture (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,750 |
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
(TIDES) (1) |
|
|
90,058 |
|
|
|
90,193 |
|
|
|
90,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
81,578 |
|
|
$ |
98,091 |
|
|
$ |
105,930 |
|
|
$ |
116,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,374 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
When the TIDES were issued in 1999, we reported the securities as a component of
temporary equity because they have predominantly equity-like characteristics which are not
normally found in debt securities (including traditional subordinated debt). In 2004, we
changed that classification to report the securities as subordinated debt in order to comply
with a new accounting standard. |
16
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We operate two types of businesses: funeral homes, which account for approximately 75% of our
revenues, and cemeteries, which account for approximately 25% of our revenues. Funeral homes are
principally a service business that provide funeral services (burial and cremation) and sell
related merchandise, such as caskets and urns. Cemeteries are primarily a sales business that sells
interment rights (grave sites and mausoleums) and related merchandise such as markers and
memorials. As of December 31, 2005, we operated 133 funeral homes in 28 states and 29 cemeteries in
12 states within the United States. Substantially all administrative activities are conducted in
our home office in Houston, Texas.
Factors affecting our funeral operating results include: demographic trends in terms of
population growth and average age, which impact death rates and number of deaths; establishing and
maintaining leading market share positions supported by strong local heritage and relationships;
effectively responding to increasing cremation trends by packaging complementary services and
merchandise; controlling salary and merchandise costs; and exercising pricing leverage related to
our at-need business to increase average revenues per contract. In simple terms, volume and price
are the two variables that affect funeral revenues. The average revenue per contract is influenced
by the mix of traditional and cremation services because our average cremation service revenue is
approximately 36% of the average revenue earned from a traditional burial service. Funeral homes
have a relatively fixed cost structure. Thus small changes in revenues, up or down, normally cause
significant changes to our profitability.
We implemented several significant long-term initiatives in our funeral operations at the
beginning of 2004 designed to improve operating and financial results by growing market share and
increasing profitability. We introduced a more decentralized, entrepreneurial and local operating
model that included operating and financial standards developed from our best funeral operations,
along with an incentive compensation plan to reward business managers for successfully meeting or
exceeding the standards. The operating model and standards, which we refer to as Being the Best,
focus on the key drivers of a successful funeral operation, organized
around three primary areas
market share, people and operating and financial metrics. The model and standards are the measures
by which we judge the success of each funeral business.
The cemetery operating results are affected by the size and success of our sales organization
because approximately 55% of our cemetery revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 relate to
sales of grave sites and mausoleums and related merchandise and services before the time of need.
We believe that changes in the level of consumer confidence (a measure of whether consumers will
spend for discretionary items) also affect the amount of cemetery revenues. Approximately 10% of
our cemetery revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 are attributable to investment earnings
on trust funds and finance charges on installment contracts. Changes in the capital markets and
interest rates affect this component of our cemetery revenues. We are implementing operating and
financial standards in our cemetery operations in 2006 similar to the funeral operations discussed
above. The standards are organized around market share, people and operational and financial
metrics to improve the long-term success of the cemeteries.
Prior to 2001, we accumulated a large amount of debt and contingent obligations from
acquisitions. Our business strategy during the four years ended December 31, 2004 focused on
increasing operating cash flow and improving our financial condition by reducing debt to lower our
interest expense and improve our credit profile. We have not been actively seeking businesses to
acquire; instead we have been focused on selling underperforming businesses and reducing our debt.
We have sold 38 funeral homes and 13 cemeteries along with 22 parcels of excess real estate. We
have reduced our debt and contingent obligations by approximately $87 million during the period
January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2004. During January 2005, we refinanced our senior debt by
issuing $130 million of Senior Notes due in 2015. This refinancing represented a milestone. The
refinancing was the culmination of the effort to reaccess the capital markets and to extend the
maturities of our senior debt and to gain the flexibility to reinvest our cash flow in our
core business. We plan to use the net cash proceeds from the offering and our cash flow to
grow our Company through selective acquisitions. We ended the year with approximately $25 million
in cash and short-term investments, primarily from the proceeds of the Senior Notes and positive
cash flow. During September 2005, we acquired a funeral business consisting of two chapels in
northern Florida, the first acquisition since 2002.
We changed our method of accounting for preneed selling costs in 2005 which affects the
comparability of the costs and expenses in the results of operations. The cumulative impact of the
change was a charge in the amount of $22.8 million, net of tax, equal to $1.24 per diluted share.
See the following section, Accounting Method Change, and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we evaluate estimates and judgments, including those
17
related to revenue
recognition, realization of accounts receivable, intangible assets, property and equipment and
deferred tax assets. We base our estimates on historical experience, third party data and
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these
considerations form the basis for making judgments about the amount and timing of revenues and
expenses, the carrying value of assets and the recorded amounts of liabilities. Actual results may
differ from these estimates and such estimates may change if the underlying conditions or
assumptions change. Historical performance should not be viewed as indicative of future
performance, because there can be no assurance the margins, operating income and net earnings as a
percentage of revenues will be sustained consistently from year to year.
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements presented herewith, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our significant
accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe
the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Funeral and Cemetery Operations
We record the sales of funeral merchandise and services when the funeral service is performed.
Sales of cemetery interment rights are recorded as revenue in accordance with the retail land sales
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate. This method generally provides for the recognition of revenue in the period in which
the customers cumulative payments exceed 10% of the contract price related to the real estate.
Costs related to the sales of interment rights, which include property and other costs related to
cemetery development activities, are charged to operations using the specific identification method
in the period in which the sale of the interment right is recognized as revenue. Revenue from the
sales of cemetery merchandise and services are recognized in the period in which the merchandise is
delivered or the service is performed. Revenues to be recognized from the delivery of merchandise
and performance of services related to contracts that were acquired in acquisitions are typically
lower than those originated by the Company and are likely to exceed the cash collected from the
contract and received from the trust at maturity.
Allowances for customer cancellations, refunds and bad debts are provided at the date that the
contract is executed. In addition, we monitor changes in delinquency rates and provide additional
bad debt and cancellation reserves when warranted. When preneed funeral services and merchandise
are funded through third-party insurance policies, we earn a commission on the sale of the
policies. Insurance commissions are recognized as revenues when the commission is no longer subject
to refund, which is usually one year after the policy is issued.
Preneed selling costs consist of sales commissions and other direct related costs of
originating preneed sales contracts. Prior to 2005, these costs were deferred and amortized into
funeral and cemetery costs and expenses over the period we expect to perform the services or
deliver the merchandise covered by the preneed contracts. The periods over which the costs were
recognized were based on actuarial statistics for the actual contracts we hold, provided by a
third-party administrator. Beginning in 2005, we changed our method of accounting for preneed
selling costs. Preneed selling costs are now expensed as incurred.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired, as
determined by management in transactions accounted for as purchases, is recorded as goodwill. Many
of the acquired funeral homes have provided high quality service to families for generations. The
resulting loyalty often represents a substantial portion of the value of a funeral business.
Goodwill is typically not associated with or recorded for the cemetery businesses. In accordance
with SFAS No. 142, we review the carrying value of goodwill at least annually on reporting units
(aggregated geographically) to determine if facts and circumstances exist which would suggest that
this intangible asset might be carried in excess of fair value. Fair value is determined by
discounting the estimated future cash flows of the businesses in each reporting unit at the
Companys weighted average cost of capital less debt allocable to the reporting unit and by
reference to recent sales transactions of similar businesses. The calculation of fair value can
vary dramatically with changes in estimates of the number of future services performed, inflation
in costs, and the Companys cost of
capital, which is impacted by long-term interest rates. If impairment is indicated, then an
adjustment will be made to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill to fair value.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and
separate income tax returns in the states in which we operate. We record deferred taxes for
temporary differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and
liabilities, in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company records a
valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets for which realization is
uncertain. Management reviews the valuation allowance at the end of each quarter and makes
adjustments if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be
realized.
18
Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has four stock incentive plans under which stock options have been issued.
Additionally, the Company sponsors an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) under which employees can
purchase common stock at a discount. The stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to
or greater than the fair market value of the Companys Common Stock. Substantially all of the
options granted under the four stock option plans have ten-year terms. The options generally vest
over a period of two to four years. The Company accounts for stock options and shares issued under
the ESPP under APB Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation cost is recognized in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Had the Company accounted for stock options and shares
pursuant to its employee stock benefit plans under SFAS No. 123 for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2005, net income for those periods would have been lower by approximately $0.01 for each
period.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2005), Share-Based Payment,
which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement
123 (R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Statement 123 (R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options and the employee stock purchase plan, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values and the pro forma disclosure
alternative is no longer allowable under Statement 123 (R). The revised standard is effective in
the first annual reporting period of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The
Company will adopt FAS No. 123R in the first fiscal quarter of its 2006 fiscal year and expects to
use the modified prospective application method, which results in no restatement of the Companys
previously issued annual Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption of FAS No. 123R using the
modified prospective applications method is not expected to have a material impact on the
consolidated financial position and no impact on cash flows of the Company. The future
compensation expense will vary in the future due to changes in the number, value and vesting terms
of stock-based instruments granted to employees. Management currently estimates that the adoption
of FAS No. 123R will reduce net income in 2006 within a range of $0.1 million to $0.2 million.
We have also granted restricted stock to certain officers of the Company, which vest over a
period of four years. These shares are valued at the dates granted and the value is charged to
operations as the shares vest.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Except as noted for Goodwill, the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the net asset may not be recoverable
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to
provide any future service potential to the Company are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or
fair value less estimated cost to sell. The revenues and expenses, as well as gains, losses and
impairments, from those assets are reported in the discontinued operations section of the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods presented.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Trust Funds
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, as revised,
(FIN 46R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. This interpretation clarifies the circumstances in which certain entities
that do not have equity investors with a controlling financial interest must be consolidated by its
sponsor. The Company implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, which resulted, for financial
reporting purposes, in the consolidation of the Companys preneed and perpetual care trust funds.
The investments of such trust funds have been reported at market value and the Companys future
obligations to deliver merchandise and services have been reported at estimated settlement amounts.
The Company has also recognized the non-controlling financial interests of third parties in the
trust funds. There was no
cumulative effect of an accounting change recognized by the Company as a result of the
implementation of FIN 46R. The implementation of FIN 46R affected certain accounts on the Companys
balance sheet beginning March 31, 2004 as described below; however, it does not affect cash flow,
net income or the manner in which we recognize and report revenues.
Although FIN 46R requires consolidation of preneed and perpetual care trusts, it does not
change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. In the case of
preneed trusts, the customers are the principal beneficiaries. In the case of perpetual care
trusts, the Company does not have a right to access the corpus in the perpetual care trusts. For
these reasons, the Company has recognized non-controlling interests in our financial statements to
reflect third party interests in these consolidated trust funds.
19
Both the preneed trusts and the cemetery perpetual care trusts hold investments in marketable
securities which have been classified as available-for-sale. The investments are reported at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses allocated to Non-controlling interests in trust investment
in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Unrealized gains and losses attributable to the
Company, but that have not been earned through the performance of services or delivery of
merchandise, are allocated to deferred revenues.
Also beginning March 31, 2004, the Company began recognizing the income, gains and losses of
the preneed trusts and the unrealized income, gains and losses of the cemetery perpetual care
trusts. The Company recognizes a corresponding expense equal to the recognized earnings of these
trusts attributable to the non-controlling interest holders. When such earnings attributable to the
Company have not been earned through the performance of services or delivery of merchandise, the
Company will record such earnings as deferred revenue.
For preneed trusts, the Company recognizes as revenues amounts attributed to the
non-controlling interest holders and the Company, including accumulated earnings, when the
contracted services have been performed and merchandise delivered. For cemetery perpetual care
trusts, the Company recognizes investment earnings in cemetery revenues when such earnings are
realized and distributable. Such earnings are intended to defray cemetery maintenance costs
incurred by the Company.
Accounting Changes
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting No.
154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (FAS No. 154). This statement is a replacement of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20 and FAS No. 3. FAS No. 154 changes the requirements for
the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle and error corrections. It
establishes, unless impracticable and in the absence of explicit transition requirements,
retrospective application as the required method of a change in accounting principle to the newly
adopted accounting principle. Also, it establishes guidance for reporting corrections of errors as
reporting errors involves adjustments to previously issued financial statements similar to those
generally applicable to reporting accounting changes retrospectively. FAS No. 154 also provides
guidance for determining and reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable.
FAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in the fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt the requirements beginning January 1,
2006, which is not expected to have an effect on the Companys 2005 financial statements.
ACCOUNTING METHOD CHANGE
Preneed Selling Costs
On June 30, 2005, the Company changed its method of accounting for deferred obtaining costs,
which are preneed selling costs incurred, for the origination of prearranged funeral and cemetery
service and merchandise sales contracts. Prior to this change, commissions and other direct
selling costs related to originating preneed funeral and cemetery service and merchandise sales
contracts were deferred and amortized with the objective of recognizing the selling costs in the
same period that the related revenue is recognized. Under the prior accounting method, the
commissions and other direct selling costs, which are current obligations are paid and use
operating cash flow, are not recognized currently in the income statement. The Company believes it
is preferable to expense the current obligation for the commissions and other costs rather than
defer these costs. The Company also believes the new accounting method improves the comparability
of its reported earnings with other public companies in the death care industry. Because the three
largest public death care companies now expense selling costs (two of which changed in 2005),
investors and other users of the financial information will now be able to more easily compare our
financial results to those deathcare companies.
The Company has applied this change in accounting method effective January 1, 2005. As of
January 1, 2005, the Company recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting method of $35.8
million pretax or $22.8 million after tax (net of income tax benefit of $13.0 million), or $1.24
per diluted share, which represents the cumulative balance of deferred preneed selling costs in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. Therefore, the Companys results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005 is
reported on the basis of our changed method. The annual impact on earnings per diluted share is
approximately $0.05. The change has no effect on cash flow from operations. Refer to Note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, for the change in
accounting method for preneed selling costs and comparison of results as reported in this annual
report and under the previous method.
20
SELECTED INCOME AND OPERATIONAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain income statement data for Carriage expressed as a
percentage of net revenues for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Total gross
profit |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
General and administrative
expenses |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
The following table sets forth the number of funeral homes and cemeteries owned and operated
by Carriage for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Funeral homes at beginning of
period |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Divestitures, mergers or closures
of existing funeral homes |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral homes at end of
period |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemeteries at beginning of
period |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemeteries at end of
period |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a discussion of Carriages results of operations for 2003, 2004, and 2005.
The term same-store or existing operations refers to funeral homes and cemeteries owned and
operated for the entirety of each period being compared.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
The following is a discussion of the Companys results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005.
Net income (loss), which includes the effect of discontinued operations, totaled $(1.19) per
diluted share compared to $0.51 per share for 2004. The decrease is primarily attributable to
additional interest of $6.9 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, specifically related to the senior
debt refinancing and the change in accounting method of $22.8 million, net, equal to $1.24 per
diluted share in 2005. Additionally, 2004 benefited from a $4.1 million income tax benefit related
to the change in the deferred tax valuation allowance. This added $0.22 per diluted share to
2004s earnings.
Funeral Home Segment. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the net
revenues and gross profit of the Company from the funeral home operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Total same-store revenue |
|
$ |
110,903 |
|
|
$ |
113,342 |
|
|
$ |
2,439 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Acquired and closed |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
% |
Preneed insurance commissions revenue |
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from continuing operations |
|
$ |
112,504 |
|
|
$ |
116,072 |
|
|
$ |
3,568 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,972 |
|
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
(85.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total same-store gross profit |
|
$ |
28,213 |
|
|
$ |
28,190 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
Acquired and closed |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Preneed insurance commissions revenue |
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from continuing operations |
|
$ |
29,452 |
|
|
$ |
30,410 |
|
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(237 |
) |
|
|
(113.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Funeral same-store revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased $2.4 million, or
2.2%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, as we experienced an increase of 1.9% to
$4,993 in the average revenue per service and an increase of 58 additional contracts, or 0.3%, for
those existing operations. Cremation services represented 32.8% of the number of funeral services
during 2005 compared to 31.3% for 2004, and our average revenue per cremation service increased 2.2
percent to $2,434.
Total funeral same-store gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2005 was essentially
flat compared to 2004 and gross profit from continuing operations increased $1.0 million, equal to
the $1.0 million increase in preneed insurance commission revenue. Gross profit for the year ended
December 31, 2005 was minimally affected by the change in accounting method for preneed selling
costs. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the change in
accounting method. Funeral costs and expenses increased approximately $2.6 million or 3.1% from
2004. The most significant variance year over year was noncash charge of $0.8 million in 2005 to
modify the employee vacation plan.
Cemetery Segment. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the net
revenues and gross profit of the Company from the cemetery operations for the year ended December
31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenues from continuing operations |
|
$ |
37,390 |
|
|
$ |
38,962 |
|
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
|
|
(30.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from continuing operations |
|
$ |
8,874 |
|
|
$ |
6,855 |
|
|
$ |
(2,019 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No cemetery businesses were acquired during the two years; one cemetery, which is included in
discontinued operations, was sold during 2005.
Cemetery revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased
$1.6 million, or 4.2%, over the year ended December 31, 2004 as investment income and gains from
the perpetual care trust funds contributed $1.1 million to the year over year improvement. Cemetery
gross profit from continuing operations decreased $2.0 million, or 22.8%, compared to 2004,
substantially due to higher preneed selling costs as a result of the change in accounting method.
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2005 was reduced by approximately $1.5 million for the
change in accounting method for preneed selling costs. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a discussion of the change in accounting method. Excluding the affect of the change
in accounting method for preneed selling costs, gross margin from continuing operations decreased
from 18.1% for the year ended December 31, 2004 to 17.6% for the year ended December 31, 2005 due
to higher costs of maintaining the facilities and grounds.
Other. General and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million for the year ended December
31, 2005 primarily because of higher professional and consulting fees related to compliance with
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and implementing a new cemetery system.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased $1.7 million, or 9.9%,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. Although debt outstanding has increased by
approximately $31 million, or 28.2%, during 2005, we are not reporting a proportional increase in
interest expense because the 2004 expense was negatively impacted by higher loan fees and compound
interest on the deferred interest on the convertible subordinated debentures.
Income Taxes. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the
income taxes for 2004 and 2005.
22
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
The following is a discussion of the Companys results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004.
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2004
were $0.60. Excluding the reduction in the deferred tax valuation allowance of $4.1 million or
$0.22 per diluted share, the 15.2 percent improvement from $0.33 to $0.38 per share was
attributable to lower interest expense and improvements in both funeral and cemetery profitability.
Net income for 2004, which includes the effect of discontinued operations, totaled $0.51 per
diluted share ($0.29 per share excluding the reduction in the deferred tax valuation allowance
equal to $0.22 per share) compared to $0.37 per share for 2003. A significant portion of the
decrease is attributable to impairment charges before taxes of $ 3.7 million, equal to $ 0.13 per
diluted share, net of gains totaling $1.0 million pretax, equal to $0.03 per diluted share, from
the sales in 2004 of three funeral home businesses.
Funeral Home Segment. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the net
revenues and gross profit of the Company from the funeral home operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. For purposes of our discussion, the
revenue and gross profit of our businesses identified to be sold are included in the same-store
classification up to the quarter prior to their sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Total same-store revenue |
|
$ |
111,737 |
|
|
$ |
112,304 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Less businesses held for sale |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Preneed insurance commissions revenue |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from continuing operations |
|
$ |
112,588 |
|
|
$ |
112,816 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
3,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
$ |
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
(47.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total same-store gross profit |
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
$ |
28,212 |
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Less businesses held for sale |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Preneed insurance commissions revenue |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from continuing operations |
|
$ |
29,098 |
|
|
$ |
29,429 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
|
(36.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral same-store revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased $0.6 million, or
0.5%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, as we experienced an increase of 3.4% to
$4,903 in the average revenue per service for those existing operations and the number of services
declined by 659, or 2.9%. Cremation services represented 31.9% of the number of funeral services
during 2005, compared to 30.7% for 2003.
Total funeral same-store gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased $0.6
million, or 2.2% from 2003, as a result of the increase in same-store revenues given the
predominately fixed cost structure of our businesses. Funeral costs and expenses remained constant
from 2003.
Cemetery Segment. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the net
revenues and gross profit of the Company from the cemetery operations for the year ended December
31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003:
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Total same-store revenue |
|
$ |
35,086 |
|
|
$ |
38,030 |
|
|
$ |
2,944 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Less businesses held for sale |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from continuing operations |
|
$ |
34,351 |
|
|
$ |
37,390 |
|
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total same-store gross profit |
|
$ |
8,791 |
|
|
$ |
9,023 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Less businesses held for sale |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from continuing operations |
|
$ |
8,521 |
|
|
$ |
8,874 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
|
(44.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No cemetery businesses were acquired or sold during the two years; one cemetery was held for
sale at the end of 2004.
Cemetery same-store revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased $2.9 million, or
8.4%, over the year ended December 31, 2003, and cemetery same store gross profit increased $0.2
million, or 2.6%, over 2003. Revenues from preneed interment sales increased $2.6 million. Though
the number of interments sold on a preneed basis remained the same, the average price per space
increased 15.1%. Continuing gross margin decreased from 24.8% for the year ended December 31, 2003
to 23.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004 due to higher sales discounts, bad debts and
facilities and grounds costs. Higher sales discounts on property negatively impacted revenues and
gross profit by $0.8 million year-over-year. Bad debts were $1.0 million higher than the prior year
and facilities and grounds expenses increased $0.3 million, primarily due to higher property taxes,
insurance and utilities.
Other. General and administrative expenses increased $0.2 million for the year ended December
31, 2004 primarily because 2004 included higher depreciation on computer and software additions
during the last 12 months and higher professional fees, a large portion of which related to
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Other charges in 2004 consist primarily of a pretax charge of $0.5 million to write off
capitalized costs of a cemetery accounting system development project that the Company terminated.
Included in other income for 2004 are pretax gains totaling $0.9 million from the sales of
real estate and other assets.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 declined $0.9 million, or 4.9%, compared
to the year ended December 31, 2003. While the debt outstanding has decreased by approximately $25
million, or 19.2%, during 2004, we did not realize a proportional decrease in interest expense
because the current year expense was negatively impacted by higher loan fees and compound interest
on the deferred interest on the convertible subordinated debenture.
Income Taxes. The Company recorded income taxes for continuing operations at the effective
rate of 38.5 percent and 37.6 percent (excluding the effect of the change in the valuation
allowance) for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The Company recognized tax
benefits related to the change in the valuation allowance related to its deferred tax assets of
$0.1 million and $4.1 million in 2003 and 2004, respectively. The remaining valuation allowance at
December 31, 2004 was attributable to the deferred tax asset related to the state operating losses.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $7.9 million at December 31, 2005, representing an increase
of $6.0 million from December 31, 2004. Additionally, short term investments totaled $16.9 million
at year end 2005 compared to zero at December 31, 2004. The primary source of the increase in cash
and short term investments is due to the refinancing of our senior debt in January 2005. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, cash provided by operating activities was $1.7 million compared to
$24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Of the $22.5 million decrease in cash provided
from operating activities, $17.3 million was attributable to the $10.3 million payment of deferred
interest on the convertible junior subordinated debenture in 2005 compared to the deferral of this
interest totaling $7.0 million in the prior period. The Company also paid additional interest
totaling $6.0 million in connection with the senior note refinancing to pay off the old notes
early. Cash used in investing activities totaled $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to cash used in the amount of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, because
we invested
24
net of maturities, $16.9 million,, in short term investments, acquired a funeral
business for $1.3 million and spent $2.5 million more for capital expenditures. The additional
capital expenditures were related to our new cemetery computer systems and mausoleums. Cash
provided from financing activities of $28.4 million in 2005 consisted primarily of the proceeds
from the senior note refinancing compared to debt repayments in 2004 and 2003. Cash and short-term
investments totaled $24.9 million at year end.
In January 2005, the Company issued $130 million of 7.875% Senior Notes due in 2015. The
proceeds from these notes were used to refinance our outstanding senior debt, including payments
for accrued interest and make-whole payment, bring current the deferred distributions on the
convertible junior subordinated debentures and the TIDES, and for general corporate purposes. In
connection with the early retirement of the senior debt, the Company made a required make whole
payment of $6.0 million in the form of additional interest and recorded a charge to write off $0.7
million of unamortized loan costs. These charges equal $4.2 million after tax, or $0.23 per
diluted share, and was reported in the first quarter of 2005. The refinancing improved the
Companys liquidity because debt totaling approximately $96 million due in 2006 and 2008 was
replaced by debt maturing in ten years.
The outstanding principal of our senior debt at December 31, 2005 totaled $141.4 million and
consisted of $130.0 million in Senior Notes, a $35 million revolving line of credit, and $11.4
million in acquisition indebtedness and capital lease obligations. Additionally, $0.7 million in
letters of credit were issued under the credit facility and were outstanding at December 31, 2005.
In April 2005, the Company entered into a $35 million senior secured revolving credit facility
to replace the existing unsecured credit facility. Borrowings under the new credit facility bear
interest at prime or LIBOR options with the initial LIBOR option set at LIBOR plus 300 basis
points, matures in five years and is collateralized by all personal property and funeral home real
property in certain states. The facility is currently undrawn, except for the letters of credit
referred to above, and no borrowings are anticipated during 2006. $34.3 million is available to
borrow at December 31, 2005.
A total of $93.8 million was outstanding on December 31, 2005 on our convertible junior
subordinated debenture. Amounts outstanding under the debenture are payable to the Companys
affiliate trust, Carriage Services Capital Trust, bear interest at 7.0% and mature in 2029.
Substantially all the assets of the Trust consist of the convertible junior subordinated debentures
of the Company. In 1999, the Trust issued 1.875 million shares of term income deferrable equity
securities (TIDES). The rights of the debentures are functionally equivalent to those of the
TIDES.
The convertible junior subordinated debenture payable to the affiliated trust and the TIDES
each contain a provision for the deferral of interest payments and distributions for up to 20
consecutive quarters at the Companys discretion. During the period in which distribution payments
are deferred, distributions will continue to accumulate at the 7.0% annual rate. Also, the deferred
distributions themselves accumulate distributions at the annual rate of 7.0% and are recorded as a
liability. During the deferral period, we are prohibited from paying dividends on the common stock
or repurchasing its common stock, subject to limited exceptions. The company deferred
distributions on the TIDES from September 2003 through December 2004. In March 2005, the Company
paid the $10.3 million for the cumulative deferred distributions on the TIDES and is currently
paying the quarterly interest and distributions.
Management believes we have enough cash and liquidity to meet our operating needs and execute
our acquisition strategy. We do no expect to borrow on our credit facility.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our balance sheet liabilities to make future payments as of
December 31, 2005. Where appropriate we have indicated the footnote to our annual Consolidated
Financial Statements where additional information is available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Reference |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
5 Years |
Long-term debt |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
130.5 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Convertible junior subordinated
debenture (a) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
246.3 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table summarizes our off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2005.
Where appropriate we have indicated the footnote to our annual Consolidated Financial Statements
where additional information is available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Reference |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
5 Years |
Operating leases |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Interest payments on long-term debt |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
246.8 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
159.4 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Consulting agreements |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Management agreements |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266.2 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
163.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The obligations related to our off-balance sheet arrangements are significant to our future
liquidity; however, although we can provide no assurances, we anticipate that these obligations
will be funded from cash provided from our operating activities. If we are not able to meet these
obligations with cash provided for by our operating activities, we may be required to access the
capital markets or draw down on our credit facilities.
Additionally, we are party to a variety of contractual agreements under which we may be
obligated to indemnify the other party for certain matters. These contracts primarily relate to
the purchase or sale of business assets, commercial contracts and operating leases and arose
through representations and warranties (e.g., ownership of assets or environmental matters). The
terms of these indemnifications range in duration and may not be explicitly defined.
SEASONALITY
The Companys business can be affected by seasonal fluctuations in the death rate. Generally,
the rate is higher during the winter months because the incidences of death from influenza and
pneumonia are higher during this period than other periods of the year.
INFLATION
Inflation has not had a significant impact on the results of Carriages operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information, this Annual Report contains forward-looking statements
within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements include any projections of earnings, revenues, asset sales, cash flow, debt levels or
other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for
future operation; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any
statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
Forward-looking statements may include the words may, will, estimate, intend, believe,
expect, project, forecast, plan, anticipate and other similar words.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MARKET RISK DISCLOSURE
Carriage is exposed to market risk primarily related to potential increases in interest rates
related to the Companys debt, decreases in interest rates related to the Companys short-term
investments and changes in the values of securities associated with the preneed and perpetual care
trusts. Management is actively involved in monitoring exposure to market risk and developing and
utilizing appropriate risk management techniques when appropriate and when available for a
reasonable price. We are not exposed to any other significant market risks including commodity
price risk, nor foreign currency exchange risk.
Carriage monitors current and forecasted interest rate risk in the ordinary course of business
and seeks to maintain optimal financial flexibility, quality and solvency. As of December 31, 2005,
approximately 92% of total debt is fixed rate obligations. Given the current outlook for increasing
interest rates, we believe the current bias to fixed rate debt is appropriate.
We do not currently have any floating rate long-term borrowings outstanding under our $35
million floating rate line of credit. If we borrow against the line of credit, any change in the
floating rate would cause a change in interest expense.
26
The 7.875% Senior Notes were issued at par and are carried at a cost of $130 million. Current
quotes indicate that cost approximates market value. The convertible junior subordinated debenture
payable to Carriage Services Capital Trust pay interest at the fixed rate of 7% and are carried on
the Companys balance sheet at a cost of approximately $93.8 million. We estimate a value of
$84 million and $79 million at December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, based on available
broker quotes of the corresponding preferred securities issued by the Trust. Increases in market
interest rates may cause the value of these instruments to decrease but such changes will not
affect the Companys interest costs. The remainder of Carriages long-term debt and leases consist
of non-interest bearing notes and fixed rate instruments that do not trade in a market, or
otherwise have a quoted market value. Any increase in market interest rates causes the fair value
of those liabilities to decrease.
Securities subject to market risk consist of investments held by our preneed funeral, cemetery
merchandise and services and perpetual care trust funds. See Note 6 and 8 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for the estimate of the fair values of those securities.
27
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
|
29 |
|
|
|
Attestation of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
30 |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
31 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 |
|
32 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 |
|
33 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 |
|
34 |
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 |
|
35 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 |
|
36 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
37 |
28
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys
assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 using the framework specified in Internal Control Integrated Framework,
published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such
assessment, management has concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting
was effective as of December 31, 2005.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, which also audited the financial statements of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as stated in their report which is presented in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Saporito |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
29
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carriage Services, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Carriage Service, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Carriage Service, Inc. management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of Carriage Service, Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Carriage Services, Inc. maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion,
Carriage Services, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Carriage Services, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those Consolidated Financial Statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
March 10, 2006
30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carriage Services, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Carriage Services, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These Consolidated Financial Statements are
the responsibility of Carriage Services, Inc.s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these Consolidated Financial Statements and financial statement schedules based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Carriage Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Carriage Services, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial
reporting.
As discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company changed its method of
accounting for preneed selling costs in 2005.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
March 10, 2006
31
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
$ |
7,949 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,908 |
|
Accounts receivable-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $940 in 2004 and
$937 in 2005 |
|
|
12,941 |
|
|
|
13,412 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
4,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories and other current assets |
|
|
12,815 |
|
|
|
12,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
51,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed receivables and trust investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
65,855 |
|
|
|
67,995 |
|
Funeral |
|
|
49,494 |
|
|
|
50,420 |
|
Receivables from preneed funeral contracts |
|
|
18,074 |
|
|
|
17,411 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$40,831 in 2004 and $45,694 in 2005 |
|
|
104,893 |
|
|
|
105,435 |
|
Cemetery property |
|
|
62,649 |
|
|
|
62,905 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
156,983 |
|
|
|
157,358 |
|
Deferred obtaining costs |
|
|
35,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other non-current assets |
|
|
8,581 |
|
|
|
25,608 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
31,201 |
|
|
|
32,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
565,156 |
|
|
$ |
570,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
22,039 |
|
|
$ |
22,163 |
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale |
|
|
2,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
26,792 |
|
|
|
24,237 |
|
Senior long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
102,714 |
|
|
|
134,572 |
|
Convertible junior subordinated debenture due in 2029 to an affiliated trust |
|
|
93,750 |
|
|
|
93,750 |
|
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion |
|
|
5,424 |
|
|
|
4,775 |
|
Deferred interest on convertible junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
10,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred cemetery revenue |
|
|
46,787 |
|
|
|
51,928 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral contracts revenue |
|
|
30,973 |
|
|
|
29,446 |
|
Non-controlling interests in funeral and cemetery trust investments |
|
|
98,652 |
|
|
|
102,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
415,983 |
|
|
|
441,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests in perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
32,212 |
|
|
|
33,112 |
|
Non-controlling interests in perpetual care trust investments associated with assets
held for sale |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; 17,910,000 and
18,458,000 issued and outstanding in 2004 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
188,029 |
|
|
|
190,502 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(71,056 |
) |
|
|
(92,921 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
116,438 |
|
|
|
96,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
565,156 |
|
|
$ |
570,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
32
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
112,209 |
|
|
$ |
112,504 |
|
|
$ |
116,072 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
34,351 |
|
|
|
37,390 |
|
|
|
38,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,560 |
|
|
|
149,894 |
|
|
|
155,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
83,125 |
|
|
|
83,052 |
|
|
|
85,662 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
25,830 |
|
|
|
28,516 |
|
|
|
32,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,955 |
|
|
|
111,568 |
|
|
|
117,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
37,605 |
|
|
|
38,326 |
|
|
|
37,265 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
10,492 |
|
|
|
10,665 |
|
|
|
12,383 |
|
Other charges (income) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
26,681 |
|
|
|
27,166 |
|
|
|
25,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(17,900 |
) |
|
|
(17,027 |
) |
|
|
(18,711 |
) |
Additional interest and other costs of senior debt refinancing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,933 |
) |
Other income (loss) |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense and other |
|
|
(17,243 |
) |
|
|
(16,087 |
) |
|
|
(25,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
11,079 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3,539 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from discontinued operations |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Gains on sales and (impairments) of discontinued operations |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
(2,630 |
) |
|
|
1,301 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method, net of tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
17,444 |
|
|
|
17,786 |
|
|
|
18,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
17,808 |
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
18,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
33
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps arising
during period |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related income tax provision |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of accumulated unrealized loss on
interest rate swap |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,890 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
34
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2002 |
|
|
17,075 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
185,100 |
|
|
$ |
(86,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(265 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,091 |
|
Net income 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,625 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
Issuance of restricted common stock |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cancellation and retirement of
restricted common stock |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate
swaps, net of tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003 |
|
|
17,545 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
186,679 |
|
|
|
(80,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
105,930 |
|
Net income 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,234 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
Issuance of restricted common stock |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004 |
|
|
17,910 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
188,029 |
|
|
|
(71,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
116,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,865 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
Issuance of restricted common stock |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cancellation and retirement of
restricted common stock |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
|
18,458 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
190,502 |
|
|
$ |
(92,921 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,392 |
) |
|
$ |
96,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
35
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Revised, |
|
(Revised, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 1) |
|
See Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,756 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,934 |
|
|
|
10,790 |
|
|
|
9,224 |
|
Loan cost amortization |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
Net gain on sale of business assets |
|
|
(657 |
) |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
Stock-related compensation |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978 |
|
Loss on sale of trust investments |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Other |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities that provided (required) cash,
net of
effects from acquisitions and dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,681 |
) |
|
|
(1,820 |
) |
|
|
(3,981 |
) |
Inventories and other current assets |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
Deferred charges and other |
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
Deferred obtaining costs |
|
|
(3,623 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust investments |
|
|
(5,263 |
) |
|
|
(4,549 |
) |
|
|
(3,426 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
(1,332 |
) |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
Deferred preneed revenue |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
Deferred interest on convertible junior subordinated debenture |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
|
(10,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
14,128 |
|
|
|
23,593 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
14,680 |
|
|
|
24,196 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
Cash flows of investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of businesses and other assets |
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Purchase of short term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,724 |
) |
Maturities of short term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,816 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(6,130 |
) |
|
|
(5,759 |
) |
|
|
(8,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(2,826 |
) |
|
|
(4,544 |
) |
|
|
(25,819 |
) |
Net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(24,202 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds (payments) under bank line of credit |
|
|
(6,400 |
) |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
(25,600 |
) |
Payments on senior long-term debt and obligations under capital leases |
|
|
(7,099 |
) |
|
|
(28,149 |
) |
|
|
(72,697 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
Payment of debt origination costs and deferred debt charges |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,175 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
(13,581 |
) |
|
|
(22,963 |
) |
|
|
28,464 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued
operations |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(13,572 |
) |
|
|
(22,978 |
) |
|
|
28,464 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
6,001 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
$ |
7,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business
Carriage Services, Inc. (Carriage or the Company) was founded in 1991 and incorporated
under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1993. The Company owns and operates 133 funeral homes
and 29 cemeteries in 28 states at December 31, 2005. Carriage provides a complete range of preneed
and at need services and products related to funerals, burials and cremations.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The financial statements include the Consolidated Financial Statements of Carriage Services,
Inc. and its subsidiaries, after eliminating all significant intercompany balances and
transactions. Certain prior year amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements have been
reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
The accounting policies and procedures reflected herein have been consistently followed during
the periods presented, except for the change in accounting method discussed in Note 3 related to
expensing preneed selling costs, which occurred in 2005.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
We have revised the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2003 and 2004 consistent with
2005 to reconcile net cash provided by operating activities from net income (loss) instead of net
income (loss) from continuing operations.
Funeral and Cemetery Operations
We record the sales of funeral merchandise and services when the funeral service is performed.
Sales of cemetery interment rights are recorded as revenue in the period in which the customers
cumulative payments exceed 10% of the contract price related to the real estate. Costs related to
the sales of interment rights, which include property and other costs related to cemetery
development activities, are charged to operations using the specific identification method in the
period in which the sale of the interment right is recognized as revenue. Revenue from the sales of
cemetery merchandise and services are recognized in the period in which the merchandise is
delivered or the service is performed. Revenues recognized from the delivery of merchandise and
performance of services related to contracts that were acquired in acquisitions are typically lower
than those originated by the Company and are likely to exceed the cash collected from the contract
and received from the trust at maturity.
Allowances for customer cancellations, refunds and bad debts are provided at the date that the
sale is recognized as revenue based on our historical experience. In addition, we monitor changes
in delinquency rates and provide additional bad debt and cancellation reserves when warranted. When
preneed funeral services and merchandise are funded through third-party insurance policies, we earn
a commission on the sale of the policies. Insurance commissions are recognized as revenues at the
point at which the commission is no longer subject to refund, which is typically one year after the
policy is issued.
Net trade accounts receivable consists of approximately $7.9 million and $8.0 million of
funeral receivables and approximately $5.0 million and $5.4 million of current cemetery receivables
at December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. Non-current cemetery receivables at December 31, 2004
and 2005, those payments expected to be received beyond one year from the balance sheet date, are
included in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments.
Preneed Funeral Contracts
Funeral merchandise and services are also sold on a preneed basis and in many instances the
customer pays the contract over a period of time. The funeral revenue is not recorded until the
service is performed. Cash proceeds from preneed funeral sales less amounts that the Company may
retain under state regulations are deposited to a trust or used to purchase a third-party insurance
policy. The trust income earned and the increases in insurance benefits on the insurance products
are also deferred until the service is performed. The customer receivables and amounts deposited
in trusts that Carriage controls are included in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments.
The preneed contracts secured by third party insurance policy are not recorded as assets or
liabilities of the Company (Note 7).
In the opinion of management, the proceeds from the funeral trust funds and the insurance
policies at the times the preneed contracts mature will exceed the estimated future costs to
perform services and provide products under such arrangements. The types of instruments in which
the trusts may invest are regulated by state agencies.
37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Preneed Cemetery Merchandise and Service Trust Funds
Carriage is also generally required, by most states, to deposit a specified amount into a
merchandise and service trust fund for cemetery merchandise and service contracts sold on a preneed
basis. The principal and accumulated earnings of the trust may generally be withdrawn upon maturity
(usually the death of the purchaser) or the cancellation of the contracts. Trust fund investment
income is deferred as trust earnings accrue in the trusts, and recognized in current revenues in
the period the service is performed or merchandise delivered.
Perpetual Care Trust Investments
In accordance with respective state laws, the Company is required to deposit a specified
amount into perpetual and memorial care trust funds for each interment/entombment right and
memorial sold. Income from the trust funds is used to provide care and maintenance for the
cemeteries and mausoleums and is periodically distributed to Carriage and recognized as revenue
when realized by the trust. The Company does not have the right to withdraw any of the principal
balances of these funds.
Deferred Obtaining Costs
Deferred obtaining costs consist of sales commissions and other direct related costs of
originating preneed sales contracts. For periods prior to 2005, these costs were deferred and
amortized into funeral and cemetery costs and expenses to coincide with the expected timing of the
performance of the services or delivery of the merchandise covered by the preneed contracts. The
pattern of the periods over which the costs were recognized was based on actuarial statistics,
provided by a third party administrator, based on the actual contracts the Company held. On June
30, 2005, the Company changed its method for accounting for deferred obtaining costs, effective
January 1, 2005. See Note 3 for more detailed discussion of the Companys accounting change.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Carriage considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Many of the acquired funeral homes and former owners have provided high quality service to
families for generations. The resulting loyalty often represents a substantial portion of the value
of a funeral business. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable
assets acquired, as determined by management in transactions accounted for as purchases, is
recorded as goodwill.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company eliminated the amortization of goodwill at the
beginning of 2002. On an annual basis, the Company assesses and tests the potential impairment of
goodwill based on reporting units identified within the funeral segment that are aggregated
geographically.
38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of caskets and cemetery monuments and markers, and is recorded at
the lower of its cost basis (determined by the specific identification method) or net realizable
value.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. The costs of ordinary maintenance and
repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while renewals and betterments are capitalized.
Capitalized interest totaled approximately $24,000 and $46,000 in 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed based on the straight-line method over
the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
Buildings and improvements
|
|
15 to 40 |
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7 to 10 |
Machinery and equipment
|
|
5 to 10 |
Automobiles
|
|
5 to 7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment was comprised of the following
at December 31, 2004 and 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
$ |
26,311 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
81,379 |
|
|
|
82,329 |
|
Furniture, equipment and automobiles |
|
|
38,955 |
|
|
|
42,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,117 |
|
|
|
151,129 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(40,831 |
) |
|
|
(45,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
105,286 |
|
|
$ |
105,435 |
|
Less: Property, plant and equipment included in
assets held for sale |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,893 |
|
|
$ |
105,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Company recorded $6,810,000, $6,973,000 and $6,922,000,
respectively, in depreciation expense in income from continuing operations.
Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to
amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and
used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted
future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds
its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are
reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and
separate income tax returns in the states in which we operate. We record deferred taxes for
temporary differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and
liabilities, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, (Note 15). The
Company records a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets for
which realization is uncertain. Management reviews the valuation allowance at the end of each
quarter and makes adjustments if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the tax
benefits will be realized.
39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Employee Stock Options and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans in the form of stock option and
employee stock purchase plans, which are more fully described in Note 16. The Company accounts for
stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
whereby no compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition
and Disclosure.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2005), Share-Based Payment,
which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement
123 (R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Statement 123 (R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement
based on their fair values and the pro forma disclosure alternative is no longer allowable under
Statement 123 (R). The revised standard is effective in the first annual reporting period of the
first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company will adopt FAS No. 123R in the first
fiscal quarter of its 2006 fiscal year and expects to use the modified prospective application
method, which results in no restatement of the Companys previously issued annual Consolidated
Financial Statements. The adoption of FAS No. 123R using the modified prospective applications
method is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position and no
impact on cash flows of the Company. The future compensation expense will vary in the future due
to changes in the inputs. Management currently estimates that the adoption of FAS No. 123R will
reduce net income in 2006 within a range of $0.1 million to $0.2 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,134 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
(22,059 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share
available to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
(1.19 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
(1.20 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
(1.19 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
(1.20 |
) |
Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive
common equivalent shares consist of stock options.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carriage believes that the carrying value approximates fair value for cash and cash
equivalents and trade receivables and payables. Additionally, our floating rate credit facility,
when drawn, approximates its fair value. Management also believes that the carrying value of senior
long-term debt approximates fair value. Management estimates that the fair value of the Convertible
junior subordinated debenture at December 31, 2005 was approximately $79 million, based on
available broker quotes of the corresponding convertible preferred securities at Carriage Services
Capital Trust.
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Except as noted for Goodwill and deferred obtaining costs, the Company reviews its long-lived
assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the net
asset may not be recoverable in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). The
long-lived assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value.
Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any future service potential to the
Company are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell.
The revenues and expenses, as well as gains, losses and impairments, from those assets are reported
in the discontinued operations section of the Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods
presented.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The Company records preneed and perpetual care trust funds in accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 46, as revised, (FIN 46R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. This interpretation clarifies the
circumstances in which certain entities that do not have equity investors with a controlling
financial interest must be consolidated by its sponsor. The investments of such trust funds have
been reported at market value and the Companys future obligations to deliver merchandise and
services have been reported at estimated settlement amounts. The Company has also recognized the
non-controlling financial interests of third parties in the trust funds.
The Company implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, which resulted, for financial reporting
purposes, in the consolidation of the Companys preneed and perpetual care trust funds. There was
no cumulative effect of an accounting change recognized by the Company as a result of the
implementation of FIN 46R. The implementation of FIN 46R affected certain accounts on the Companys
balance sheet beginning March 31, 2004 as described below; however, it did not affect cash flow,
net income or the manner in which the Company recognizes and reports revenues.
Although FIN 46R requires consolidation of preneed and perpetual care trusts, it does not
change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. In the case of
preneed trusts, the customers are the legal beneficiaries. In the case of perpetual care trusts,
the Company does not have a right to access the corpus in the perpetual care trusts. For these
reasons, the Company has recognized non-controlling interests in our financial statements to
reflect third party interests in these consolidated trust funds.
Both the preneed trusts and the cemetery perpetual care trusts hold investments in marketable
securities which have been classified as available-for-sale. The investments are reported at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses allocated to Non-controlling interests in trust investments
in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Unrealized gains and losses attributable to the
Company, but that have not been earned through the performance of services or delivery of
merchandise is allocated to deferred revenues.
Also beginning March 31, 2004, the Company recognizes realized the income, gains and losses of
the preneed trusts and the unrealized income, gains and losses of the cemetery perpetual care
trusts. The Company recognizes a corresponding expense equal to the realized earnings of these
trusts attributable to the non-controlling interest holders. When such earnings attributable to the
Company have not been earned through the performance of services or delivery of merchandise, the
Company will record such earnings as deferred revenue.
For preneed trusts, the Company recognizes as revenues amounts attributed to the
non-controlling interest holders and the Company, including accumulated realized earnings, when the
contracted services have been performed and merchandise delivered. For cemetery perpetual care
trusts, the Company recognizes investment earnings in cemetery revenues when such earnings are
realized and distributable. Such earnings are intended to defray cemetery maintenance costs
incurred by the Company.
Also, the Company was required to deconsolidate Carriage Services Capital Trust (the Trust),
a trust established in 1999 to issue redeemable convertible preferred securities. The Companys
obligation to the Trust consists of convertible junior subordinated debentures. The preferred
securities of the Trust were previously classified as temporary equity in the consolidated balance
sheet. As a result of deconsolidating the Trust, the Company now reports its obligation to the
Trust, the convertible junior subordinated debentures, as a long-term liability.
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that effect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue
recognition, realization of accounts receivable, intangible assets, property and equipment and
deferred tax assets. We base our estimates on historical experience, third party data and
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these
considerations form the basis for making judgments about the amount and timing of revenues and
expenses, the carrying value of assets and the recorded amounts of liabilities. Actual results may
differ from these estimates and such estimates may change if the underlying conditions or
assumptions change. Historical performance should not be viewed as indicative of future
performance, as there can be no assurance the margins, operating income and net earnings as a
percentage of revenues will be sustained consistently from year to year.
2. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting No.
154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (FAS No. 154). This statement is a replacement of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20 and FAS No. 3. FAS No. 154 changes the requirements for
the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle and error corrections. It
establishes, unless impracticable and absence of explicit transition requirements, retrospective
application as the required method of a change in accounting principle to the newly adopted
accounting principle. Also, it establishes guidance for reporting corrections of errors as
reporting errors involves adjustments to previously issued financial statements similar to those
generally applicable to reporting accounting changes retrospectively. FAS No. 154 also provides
guidance for determining and reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable.
FAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in the fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt the requirements beginning January 1,
2006.
Impairment of Investments
In March 2004, the FASB reached consensus on the guidance provided by Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue 03-1 (EITF 03-1), The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application
to Certain Investments. The guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within
the scope of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. EITF 03-1 specifies that an impairment would
be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an
investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or
beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating the cost of the investment is
recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence of the contrary. EITF 03-1 is
effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004 except for the measurement and
recognition provisions relating to debt and equity securities which had been deferred. The
disclosure requirements continue to be effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years
ending after June 15, 2004. We adopted the disclosure provisions during the period ended June 30,
2004. The guidance for measurement and recognition provisions has subsequently been replaced by
SFAS No. 115-1 and SFAS No. 124-1 The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments which is effective for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2005. The adoption of the measurement and recognition provisions is not expected to
have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements, result of operations or liquidity
of the Company.
3. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING METHOD FOR PRENEED SELLING COSTS
On June 30, 2005, the Company changed its method of accounting for deferred obtaining costs,
which are preneed selling costs, incurred for the origination of prearranged funeral and cemetery
service and merchandise sales contracts. The Company has applied
this change in accounting method effective January 1, 2005. Therefore, the Companys results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 are reported on the basis of the changed method.
Prior to this change, commissions and other costs that were related to the origination of
prearranged funeral and cemetery service and merchandise sales were deferred and amortized with the
objective of recognizing the selling costs in the same period that the related revenue is
recognized. Under the prior accounting method, the commissions and other direct selling costs,
which are current obligations that are paid and use operating cash flow, are
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
3. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING METHOD FOR PRENEED SELLING COSTS (continued)
not recognized currently in the income statement. The Company believes it is preferable to expense
the current obligation for the commissions and other costs rather than defer these costs.
As of January 1, 2005, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting
method in the amount of $35.8 million pretax or $22.8 million after tax (net of income tax benefit
of $13.0 million), or $1.24 per diluted share, which represents the cumulative balance of deferred
obtaining costs in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The table below presents the
Companys income from continuing operations before the cumulative effect of the change in
accounting method, net income (loss), diluted earnings per share from continuing operations before
the cumulative effect of the change in accounting method and diluted net earnings (loss) per share
for the year ended December 31, 2005 had the Company not made this accounting change (in thousands,
except per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
Results under |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Prior Method |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect
of change in accounting method |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
23,601 |
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in accounting method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
The tables below presents the pro forma amounts for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
as if the accounting change had been in effect during those periods (in thousands, except per share
amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Proforma |
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
29,452 |
|
|
$ |
(985 |
) |
|
$ |
28,467 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
8,874 |
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,326 |
|
|
$ |
(3,075 |
) |
|
$ |
35,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
10,988 |
|
|
$ |
(1,922 |
) |
|
$ |
9,066 |
|
Net income |
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
7,548 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
0.50 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Proforma |
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
29,084 |
|
|
$ |
(529 |
) |
|
$ |
28,555 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
8,521 |
|
|
|
(1,804 |
) |
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,605 |
|
|
$ |
(2,333 |
) |
|
$ |
35,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5,899 |
|
|
$ |
(1,457 |
) |
|
$ |
4,442 |
|
Net income |
|
|
6,625 |
|
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
5,001 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.28 |
|
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
During 2004, the Company identified five funeral home businesses and one cemetery business to
be sold. Unique circumstances that developed during the year influenced decisions to sell rather
than operate these businesses. The carrying value of the assets of the businesses were analyzed
and the carrying value of four funeral home businesses was reduced to managements estimate of fair
value less estimated costs to sell by providing impairment charges totaling $3.7 million, a
substantial portion of which is related to specifically identified goodwill. The fair value less
estimated costs to sell for the remaining two businesses were determined to be greater than its
carrying value. In estimating fair value, management considered, among other things, the range of
preliminary prices being discussed with potential buyers.
The company sold three funeral home businesses during 2004. Those transactions generated net
cash proceeds totaling $3.3 million and a gain of approximately $1.1 million. During 2005, the
Company sold one cemetery business and two funeral home businesses. These transactions generated
net cash proceeds of $1.6 million and a gain of approximately $1.3 million.
No businesses were held for sale at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2004, assets and
liabilities associated with the two funeral home businesses and one cemetery business held for sale
in the accompanying balance sheet consisted of the following (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
200 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
393 |
|
Preneed receivables and trust investments |
|
|
2,378 |
|
Cemetery property, net |
|
|
462 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
455 |
|
Deferred obtaining costs |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
32 |
|
Deferred cemetery revenue |
|
|
515 |
|
Non-controlling interests in funeral and cemetery trust
investments |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in perpetual care trust
investments with assets held for sale |
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
The operating results of businesses sold, held for sale or closed, as well as the impairment
charges and gains on disposal are presented in the discontinued operations section, along with the
income tax effect, in the consolidated statements of operations on a comparative basis. Likewise,
the operating results and gains or losses from businesses sold or closed in the prior year have
been similarly reported for comparability. Revenues and operating income for the businesses
presented in the discontinued operations section are as follows (in thousands):
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues, net |
|
$ |
4,263 |
|
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
5. SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS
Short term investments are investments purchased with an original maturity of greater than
three months at the time of purchase. Short term investments at December 31, 2005 consisted of
commercial paper with maturity dates that range from January 2006 to April 2006 at rates ranging
from 3.65 percent to 4.21 percent per anum. Market value approximates cost.
6. PRENEED RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS
Preneed Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net of allowance for cancellations,
represent trust fund assets and customer receivables (net of unearned finance charges) for
contracts sold in advance of when the merchandise or services are needed. The components of Preneed
cemetery receivables and trust investments in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004
and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trust assets |
|
$ |
53,095 |
|
|
$ |
54,768 |
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
16,299 |
|
|
|
17,304 |
|
Unearned finance charges |
|
|
(3,155 |
) |
|
|
(3,143 |
) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
$ |
65,855 |
|
|
$ |
67,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments are reduced by the trust investment
earnings the Company has been allowed to withdraw prior to performance by the Company and amounts
received from customers that are not required to be deposited into trust, pursuant to various state
laws. Preneed cemetery sales are usually financed through interest-bearing installment sales
contracts, generally with terms of up to five years. The interest rates generally range between 12
percent and 14 percent.
The cost and market values associated with cemetery preneed trust assets at December 31, 2005
are detailed below (in thousands). The Company believes the unrealized losses related to trust
investments are temporary in nature. Net unrealized and realized gains totaled $1.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005.
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. PRENEED RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Market |
|
Cash, money market and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
6,291 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,291 |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
5,423 |
|
State obligations |
|
|
11,507 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
11,461 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
3,757 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
12,830 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
14,013 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
5,449 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
6,676 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
6,682 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
53,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
|
$ |
(669 |
) |
|
$ |
54,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated maturities of the fixed income securities included above are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,452 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
11,758 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
7,370 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. PRENEED RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
The cost and market values associated with cemetery preneed trust assets at December 31, 2004
are detailed below (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Market |
|
Cash, money market and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
5,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,025 |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
3,309 |
|
State obligations |
|
|
15,695 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
15,995 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
10,580 |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
12,497 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
8,999 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
49,876 |
|
|
$ |
3,145 |
|
|
$ |
(184 |
) |
|
$ |
52,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, net of allowance for cancellations,
represent trust fund assets and customer receivables related to contracts sold in advance of when
the services or merchandise is needed. Such contracts are secured by funds paid by the customer to
the Company. Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments are reduced by the trust investment
earnings the Company has been allowed to withdraw prior to performance by the Company and amounts
received from customers that are not required to be deposited into trust, pursuant to various state
laws.
The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments in the consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trust assets |
|
$ |
45,557 |
|
|
$ |
47,678 |
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
9,824 |
|
|
|
8,709 |
|
Allowance for contract cancellations |
|
|
(5,887 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
$ |
49,494 |
|
|
$ |
50,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. PRENEED RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
The cost and market values associated with funeral preneed trust assets at December 31, 2005
are detailed below (in thousands). The Company believes the unrealized losses related to trust
investments are temporary in nature. Net unrealized and realized gains total zero for the year
ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Market |
|
Cash, money market and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
19,216 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,216 |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
422 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,881 |
|
State obligations |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
1,291 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations and guarantees of U.S.
government agencies |
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
2,908 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,171 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
15,032 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
14,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
46,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
$ |
(444 |
) |
|
$ |
47,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated maturities of the fixed income securities included above are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
311 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
2,054 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
2,184 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
48
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. PRENEED RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
The cost and market values associated with funeral preneed trust assets at December 31, 2004
are detailed below (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Market |
|
Cash, money market and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
12,885 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,885 |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
2,453 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
196 |
|
State obligations |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
2,819 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
6,486 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
7,033 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
16,579 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
16,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
44,424 |
|
|
$ |
1,501 |
|
|
$ |
(368 |
) |
|
$ |
45,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon cancellation of a preneed funeral or cemetery contract, a customer is generally entitled
to receive a refund of the corpus and some or all of the earnings held in trust. In certain
jurisdictions, the Company is obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the
customer exceed the funds in trust including some or all investment income. As a result, when
realized or unrealized losses of a trust result in the trust being under-funded, the Company
assesses whether it is responsible for replenishing the corpus of the trust, in which case a loss
provision would be recorded. No loss amounts have been required to be recognized for the periods
presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Receivables from Preneed Funeral Contracts
The receivables from preneed funeral contracts at December 31, 2004 and 2005 represent assets
in trusts which are controlled and operated by third parties in which the Company does not have a
controlling financial interest (less than fifty percent) in the trust assets. The Company accounts
for these investments at cost.
The components of the receivables from preneed funeral contracts in the consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Amount due from preneed
funeral trust funds |
|
$ |
18,430 |
|
|
$ |
18,071 |
|
Receivables from
customers |
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
Less: allowance for
cancellation
|
|
|
(2,051 |
) |
|
|
(1,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,074 |
|
|
$ |
17,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. PRENEED RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
The following summary reflects the composition of the assets held in trust and controlled by
third parties to satisfy Carriages future obligations under preneed funeral arrangements related
to the preceding contracts at December 31, 2004 and 2005. The cost basis includes reinvested
interest and dividends that have been earned on the trust assets. Fair value includes unrealized
gains and losses on trust assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
As of December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,183 |
|
|
$ |
3,183 |
|
Fixed income investments contract |
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
11,335 |
|
Mutual funds and stocks |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Annuities |
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,071 |
|
|
$ |
17,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
As of December 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
Fixed income investments contract |
|
|
11,021 |
|
|
|
10,798 |
|
Mutual funds and stocks |
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
4,278 |
|
Annuities |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,430 |
|
|
$ |
18,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Investment Security Transactions
Cemetery and funeral trust investment security transactions recorded in Other income in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
4,165 |
|
Realized gains |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
Expenses |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Increase in
non-controlling
interests in
cemetery and
funeral trust
investments |
|
|
(2,083 |
) |
|
|
(7,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. CONTRACTS SECURED BY INSURANCE
Certain preneed funeral contracts are secured by life insurance policies. The proceeds of the
life insurance policies have been assigned to the Company and will be paid upon the death of the
insured. The proceeds will be used to satisfy the beneficiarys obligations under the preneed
contract for services and merchandise. We changed our method of accounting for preneed funeral
contracts secured by insurance at March 31, 2004 because we concluded that they are not assets and
liabilities as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6, Elements in Financial
Statements. Therefore, we have eliminated amounts relating to such preneed funeral contracts along
with the corresponding deferred revenue from our consolidated balance sheets. The elimination of
these amounts had no impact on our consolidated stockholders equity, results of operations or cash
flows.
The preneed funeral contracts secured by insurance totaled $159.9 and $166.9 million at December
31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
8. CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE TRUST INVESTMENTS
The Company is required by state law to pay a portion of the proceeds from the sale of
cemetery property interment rights into perpetual care trust funds. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 46R, the Company has consolidated the perpetual care trust funds with a
corresponding amount as Non-controlling interests in perpetual care trusts. Realized and
distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust investments are recognized in current
cemetery revenues and are used to defray cemetery maintenance costs which are expensed as incurred.
The cost and market values associated with the trust investments held in perpetual care trust funds
at December 31, 2005 are detailed below (in thousands). The Company believes the unrealized losses
related to the trust investments are temporary in nature. Net unrealized and realized gains totaled
$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Market |
|
Cash, money market and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
595 |
|
U.S. Agency obligation |
|
|
6,610 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
6,533 |
|
State obligations |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
2,629 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
9,970 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
10,997 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
3,034 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
3,242 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
31,075 |
|
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
$ |
(475 |
) |
|
$ |
32,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated maturities of the fixed income securities included above are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
7,469 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
1,795 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
8. CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
The cost and market values associated with the trust investments held in perpetual care trust
funds at December 31, 2004 are detailed below (in thousands). The cost basis of the cemetery
perpetual care trust investments below reflects an other than temporary decline in the trust assets
of $0.1 million at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Market |
|
Cash, money market and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
4,239 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,239 |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,739 |
|
U.S. Agency obligation |
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
4,530 |
|
State obligations |
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
8,415 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,757 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
3,223 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
29,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,386 |
|
|
$ |
(235 |
) |
|
$ |
31,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
8. CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE TRUST INVESTMENTS (continued)
Non-controlling interests in cemetery perpetual care trusts represent the corpus of those
trusts for which the Company is only entitled to receive the income. The components of
Non-controlling interests in cemetery perpetual care trusts as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trust assets, at market value |
|
$ |
31,201 |
|
|
$ |
32,356 |
|
Pending withdrawals of income |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(719 |
) |
Debt due to a perpetual care trust |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Pending deposits |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
$ |
32,212 |
|
|
$ |
33,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests in assets
held for sale |
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Investment Security Transactions
Perpetual care trust investment security transactions recorded in Other income in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
$ |
2,480 |
|
Realized gains |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
Expenses |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
Increase in
non-controlling
interests in
perpetual care
trust investments |
|
|
(1,354 |
) |
|
|
(3,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. DEFERRED REVENUE
Deferred revenue consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deferred cemetery revenue |
|
$ |
46,787 |
|
|
$ |
51,928 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral contracts revenue |
|
|
30,973 |
|
|
|
29,446 |
|
Non-controlling interests in funeral
and cemetery trust investments |
|
|
98,652 |
|
|
|
102,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
176,412 |
|
|
$ |
183,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests in funeral and cemetery preneed trusts represent deferred revenue
related to assets held in the preneed trusts. The Company will recognize the revenue at the time
the service is performed and merchandise is delivered. The components of Non-controlling
interests in funeral and cemetery preneed trusts as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Preneed |
|
Trust assets, at market value |
|
$ |
47,678 |
|
|
$ |
54,768 |
|
|
$ |
102,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
$ |
47,678 |
|
|
$ |
54,768 |
|
|
$ |
102,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
9. DEFERRED REVENUE (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Preneed |
|
Trust assets, at market value |
|
$ |
45,557 |
|
|
$ |
53,095 |
|
|
$ |
98,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
$ |
45,557 |
|
|
$ |
53,095 |
|
|
$ |
98,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests in assets held
for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,051 |
|
|
$ |
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Deferred charges and other non-current assets at December 31, 2004 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Agreements not to complete, net of
accumulated amortization of $3,659
and $3,944,
respectively |
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
Deferred loan costs, net of
accumulated amortization of $2,676
and $3,009,
respectively
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
4,592 |
|
Deferred tax
asset |
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
15,894 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,581 |
|
|
$ |
25,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of agreements not to compete with former owners of businesses acquired is amortized
over the term of the respective agreements, ranging from four to ten years. Deferred loan costs are
being amortized over the term of the related debt.
11. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-Term Debt
The Companys long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Credit Facility, unsecured
floating rate $45 million line at
December 31, 2004 and secured
floating rate $35 million line at
December 31, 2005. Interest is due
on a quarterly basis and on the
maturity date at prime or LIBOR
options (weighted average interest
rate was 8.25% at December 31,
2005), matures in April,
2010 |
|
$ |
25,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Senior
Notes |
|
|
70,479 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
Acquisition
debt |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
4,305 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
Less: current
portion |
|
|
(2,088 |
) |
|
|
(2,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
102,714 |
|
|
$ |
134,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, Carriages senior debt included a $45 million unsecured revolving bank
credit facility that was scheduled to mature in March 2006 and $70.5 million of Senior Notes to
insurance companies due in 2006 and 2008. In January 2005, the Company issued $130 million of
7.875 percent Senior Notes at par, due in 2015. The proceeds from these notes were used to
refinance substantially all senior debt, bring current the cumulative deferred distributions on the
convertible junior subordinated debenture and the TIDES, and for general corporate purposes. In
March 2005, the Company paid the cumulative deferred distributions on the TIDES totaling $10.9
million. During April 2005, the Company entered into a $35 million senior secured
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
11. LONG-TERM DEBT (continued)
revolving credit facility that matures in five years to replace the existing unsecured credit
facility. Borrowings under the new credit facility bear interest at prime or LIBOR options with the
current LIBOR option set at LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is collateralized by all personal
property and funeral home real property in certain states. The facility is currently undrawn and
$34.3 million is available to borrow at December 31, 2005.
Carriage, the parent entity, has no independent assets or operations. All assets and
operations are held and conducted by subsidiaries, each of which (except for Carriage Services
Capital Trust which is a single purpose entity that holds our debentures issued in connection with
our TIDES) have fully and unconditionally guaranteed our obligations under the new Senior Notes.
Additionally, we do not currently have any significant restrictions on our ability to receive
dividends or loans from any subsidiary guarantor under the new Senior Notes.
In connection with the senior debt refinancing, the Company made a required make whole
payment of $6.0 million in the form of additional interest and recorded a charge to write off $0.7
million of unamortized loan costs (in aggregate $4.2 million after tax, or $0.23 per diluted share)
during the first quarter of 2005. In connection with the new senior secured revolving credit
facility, the Company recorded a charge to write off $0.2 million or $0.01 per diluted share of
unamortized loan costs during the second quarter of 2005. These charges are included in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations as additional interest and other costs of senior debt
refinancing for 2005.
The Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in the credit facility and the
Senior Notes as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.
Acquisition debt consists of deferred purchase prices payable to sellers. The deferred
purchase price notes bear interest at 0%, discounted at imputed interest rates ranging from 6% to
8%, with original maturities from three to 15 years.
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the next five years as of December 31, 2005 are
approximately $2,026,000, $1,513,000, $2,025,000, $415,000 and $132,000, respectively and
$130,488,000 thereafter.
12. |
|
CONVERTIBLE JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURE PAYABLE TO AFFILIATE AND COMPANY OBLIGATED
MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SECURITIES OF CARRIAGE SERVICES CAPITAL TRUST |
During June 1999, Carriages wholly-owned subsidiary, Carriage Services Capital Trust, issued
1,875,000 units of 7% convertible preferred securities (TIDES), resulting in approximately $90
million in net proceeds, and the Company issued a 7% convertible junior subordinated debenture to
the Trust in the amount of $93.75 million. The convertible preferred securities have a liquidation
amount of $50 per unit, and are convertible into Carriages Common Stock at the equivalent
conversion price of $20.4375 per share of Common Stock. The subordinated debentures and the TIDES
mature in 2029 and the TIDES are guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Company. Both the
subordinated debentures and the TIDES contain a provision for the deferral of distributions for up
to 20 consecutive quarters. During the period in which distribution payments are deferred,
distributions will continue to accumulate at the 7 percent annual rate. Also, the deferred
distributions will themselves accumulate distributions at the annual rate of 7 percent. During the
period in which distributions are deferred, Carriage is prohibited from paying dividends on its
common stock or repurchasing its common stock, with limited exceptions. The Company deferred the
distributions during the period, which with interest on the unpaid distributions totaled $10.9 at
December 31, 2004. The Company brought the deferred distributions current during 2005. There are
no deferred distributions at December 31, 2005.
13. OTHER INCOME (LOSS)
Other income (loss) is comprised of net gains and losses from the disposition of various
business assets and interest income totaling $657,000, $940,000 and $(73,000) for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
Carriage leases certain office facilities, vehicles and equipment under operating leases for
terms ranging from one to 15 years. Certain of these leases provide for an annual adjustment and
contain options for renewal. Rent expense totaled $3,663,000, $3,625,000 and $3,805,000 for 2003,
2004 and 2005, respectively. Assets acquired under capital leases are included in property, plant
and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in the amount of $1,918,000 in 2004
and $1,676,000 in 2005, net of accumulated depreciation. Capital lease obligations are included in
current and long-term debt as indicated below.
At December 31, 2005, future minimum lease payments under noncancellable lease agreements were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Minimum Lease |
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Years ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
2,001 |
|
|
$ |
599 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
2010 |
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,451 |
|
|
|
12,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
12,703 |
|
|
$ |
15,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: amount representing interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,107 |
) |
Less: current portion of obligations under capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations under capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreements and Employee Benefits
Carriage obtained various agreements not to compete from former owners of businesses acquired.
Payments for such agreements are generally not made in advance. These agreements are generally for
one to 10 years and provide for future payments annually, quarterly or monthly. The aggregate
payments due under these agreements for the next five years total $986,000, $681,000, $506,000,
$188,000 and $104,000, respectively and $114,000 thereafter.
The Company has entered into various consulting agreements with former owners of businesses
acquired. Payments for such agreements are generally not made in advance. These agreements are
generally for one to 10 years and provide for future payments monthly or bi-weekly. The aggregate
payments for the next five years total $390,000, $217,000, $154,000, $111,000, $39,000,
respectively and $6,000 thereafter.
The Company has entered into employment agreements with the executive officers. These
agreements are generally for two to five years and provide for future payments bi-weekly plus
discretionary bonus payments. These payments due under these agreements for the next five years
total $1,310,000, $685,000, $495,000, $495,000 and $203,000, respectively.
Carriage sponsors a defined contribution plan (401k) for the benefit of its employees. The
Companys matching contributions and plan administrative expenses totaled $395,000, $365,000 and
$268,000 for 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The Company does not offer any post-retirement or
post-employment benefits.
Other Commitments
The Company has also entered into an agreement to outsource the processing of transactions for
the cemetery contracts during 2005. The Company and the contractor may terminate the contract for
various reasons upon written notification and set terms. Payments vary based on the level of
resources provided. The Company paid $1.2 million to the contractor for services in 2005.
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)
Litigation
Carriage and its subsidiaries are parties to a number of legal proceedings that arise from
time to time in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not expect these matters to have a material adverse
effect on the financial statements.
The Company carries insurance with coverage and coverage limits consistent with managements
assessment of risks in the business and of an acceptable level of financial exposure. Although
there can be no assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to mitigate all damages, claims or
contingencies, management believes that our insurance provides reasonable coverage for known
asserted or unasserted claims. In the event the Company sustained a loss from a claim and the
insurance carrier disputed coverage or coverage limits, the Company may record a charge in a
different period than the recovery, if any, from the insurance carrier.
15. INCOME TAXES
The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations for 2003, 2004 and 2005
consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003(1) |
|
|
2004(1) |
|
|
2005(1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S.
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current
provision (benefit) |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S.
Federal |
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
186 |
|
State |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
provision (benefit) |
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax
provision |
|
$ |
3,539 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Excludes income tax (provision) benefits from discontinued operations of $(435),
$519 and $(469) for 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. |
A reconciliation of taxes to the U.S. federal statutory rate to those reflected in the
consolidated statements of operations for 2003, 2004 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Federal statutory rate |
|
$ |
3,302 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,767 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Effect of state income taxes,
net of federal benefit |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Effect of non-deductible
expenses and other, net |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(4,063 |
) |
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,539 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
(227.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
15. INCOME TAXES (continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2004 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforwards |
|
$ |
5,527 |
|
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
Accrued liabilities and
other |
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
Amortization of non-compete
agreements |
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
Amortization and
depreciation
|
|
|
(11,372 |
) |
|
|
(12,729 |
) |
Preneed revenue and costs,
net |
|
|
6,908 |
|
|
|
20,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
18,494 |
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax
assets |
|
$ |
4,414 |
|
|
$ |
17,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax
asset |
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
Non-current deferred tax
asset |
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
15,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax
assets |
|
$ |
4,414 |
|
|
$ |
17,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current deferred tax asset is included in Inventories and other current assets at December
31, 2004 and 2005. The non-current deferred tax asset is included in Deferred charges and other
non-current assets at December 31, 2004 and 2005.
Carriage records a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets
for which realization is uncertain. Management reviews the valuation allowance at the end of each
quarter and makes adjustments if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the tax
benefits will be realized. The Company reduced its valuation allowance and recorded deferred tax
benefits in the amounts of $4.1 million (equal to $0.22 per diluted share) and $0.2 million (equal
to $0.01 per diluted share) during 2004 and 2005, respectively.
For federal income tax reporting purposes, Carriage has net operating loss carryforwards
totaling $15.7 million available at December 31, 2005 to offset future Federal taxable income,
which expire between 2021and 2025 if not utilized. Carriage also has approximately $81 million of
state net operating loss carryforwards that will expire between 2006 and 2025, if not utilized.
Based on managements assessment of the various state net operating losses, it was determined that
it is more likely than not that the Company will not be able to realize tax benefits on a
substantial amount of the state losses. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2005 is
attributable to the deferred tax asset related to the state operating losses.
16. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock Option Plans
Carriage has four stock benefit plans currently in effect under which stock option grants have
been issued: the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1995 Plan), the 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996
Plan), the 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan (the Directors Plan) and the 1998 Stock Option
Plan for Consultants (the Consultants Plan). Substantially all of the options granted under the
four stock benefit plans have ten-year terms. The options generally vest over periods that range
from two to four years. The 1995 Plan expired in 2005 and the 1996 Plan and the Directors Plan
will expire in 2006. The expiration of these plans does not affect the options previously issued
and outstanding.
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
16. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (continued)
Options under each of the plans at December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserved |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Available to Issue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
1996 Plan |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Directors Plan |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Consultants Plan |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the plans is administered by the Compensation Committee appointed by the Board of
Directors. The plans allow for options to be granted as non-qualified options, incentive stock
options, reload options, alternative appreciation rights and stock bonus options. Additionally, the
1995 and 1996 Plans allow for the issuance of restricted common stock bonus grants. The options are
granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the then fair market value of Carriages
Common Stock as determined by the Board of Directors based on trading prices on the date of the
option grant.
A summary of the status of the plans at December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and changes during
the years ended is presented in the table and narrative below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Wtd. Avg. |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Wtd. Avg. |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Wtd. Avg. |
|
|
|
(000) |
|
|
Ex Price |
|
|
(000) |
|
|
Ex Price |
|
|
(000) |
|
|
Ex Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
$ |
3.57 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
3.64 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
2.99 |
|
Canceled or expired |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
8.27 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
8.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
options granted |
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2003, 2004
and 2005, respectively: risk-free interest rates
of 2.89%, 3.00% and 4.04%; expected dividend yield of 0% for each year; expected termination rate
of 5%; expected lives of five years; expected volatility of 47%, 50% and 58%.
The following table further describes the Companys outstanding stock options at December 31,
2005 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
150% increment |
|
at 12/31/05 |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
at 12/31/05 |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$ 1.19- 1.56 |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
$ 2.06- 3.09 |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
$ 3.12- 4.66 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
$ 4.77- 6.19 |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.03 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
$ 7.56- 11.00 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
$13.25- 19.88 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.13 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
$ |
15.13 |
|
$21.00- 27.50 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.18 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
21.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1.19- 27.50 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
16. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (continued)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Carriage provides all employees the opportunity to purchase Common Stock through payroll
deductions. Purchases are made quarterly; the price being 85% of the lower of the price on the
grant date or the purchase date. In 2003, employees purchased a total of 111,638 shares at a
weighted average price of $3.01 per share. In 2004, employees purchased a total of 120,195 shares
at a weighted average price of $3.51 per share. During 2005, employees purchased a total of 86,354
shares at a weighted average price of $4.20 per share.
Deferred Compensation and Stock-Related Compensation
The Company, from time to time, issues shares of restricted common stock to certain officers
of the Company from the 1995 Plan. Twenty-five percent of the shares vest annually on each of the
next four anniversary dates of the grants. The value of the stock at the date of grant is amortized
into expense over the vesting period. The Company issued a total of 227,000, 100,000 and 268,000
shares during 2003, 2004 and 2005 with a value of $901,000, $466,000 and $1,337,000, respectively.
The Company also has a compensation plan for its outside directors under which directors may
choose to accept fully vested shares of the Companys common stock for all or a portion of their
annual retainer and meeting fees, and under which new directors receive an award of 20,000 shares
of common stock at the time of their initial election to the Board, 50% of which are vested at the
grant date and 25% of which vests on the first and second anniversary of the grant. The value of
the shares at the grant date is charged to expense as the shares vest. During the three years 2003
through 2005, the Company issued shares of common stock to directors totaling 41,422, 19,639 and
13,709, respectively, in lieu of payment in cash for their fees, the value of which was charged to
operations.
17. PREFERRED STOCK
The Company has 40,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, none of which is currently
issued and outstanding.
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As an incentive, the Company entered into arrangements with two former owners, both of which
have served as directors during the past three years, to pay them each 10% of the amount by which
the annual field level cash flow exceeds predetermined targets on certain businesses in their
respective geographic region through 2006, with a final payment payable in 2007 equal to a multiple
of six times the average of the last three years payments. The business purpose of the arrangements
was to incentivise the individuals to provide Carriage with high quality acquisition targets and to
have input in the competitive strategies of those businesses post-acquisition so that cash flows
grow over time. The terms were determined by reference to similar arrangements within the death
care industry. The incentives earned by the two individuals totaled approximately $60,000, $110,000
and $276,000 for the years 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The final payment will be determined
at the conclusion of 2006 and is currently estimated to be in the range of $1.0 million and $1.3
million.
During 2003, the Company was reimbursed for the cost of personnel and office expenses totaling
approximately $87,000 from an entity in which the Company owned a minority (12%) interest and one
of the entitys directors is Carriages Chief Executive Officer. The Company sold its interest in
the entity and Carriages CEO resigned as director of the entity during 2004.
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
19. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share for
2003, 2004 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations available
to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,899 |
|
|
$ |
10,988 |
|
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for earnings per share net
income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
17,444 |
|
|
|
17,786 |
|
|
|
18,334 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share adjusted weighted average shares and assumed
conversions |
|
|
17,808 |
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
18,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of the change in accounting method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of the change in accounting method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 0.6 million shares, 0.2 million shares and 0.1 million shares were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively,
because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common
shares during those periods.
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
20. MAJOR SEGMENTS OF BUSINESS
Carriage conducts funeral and cemetery operations only in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except number of operating locations) |
|
External revenues from continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
116,072 |
|
|
$ |
38,962 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,034 |
|
2004 |
|
|
112,504 |
|
|
|
37,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,894 |
|
2003 |
|
|
112,209 |
|
|
|
34,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,560 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
33,314 |
|
|
$ |
(35,976 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
2004 |
|
|
17,719 |
|
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
(12,313 |
) |
|
|
10,988 |
|
2003 |
|
|
20,575 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
(20,046 |
) |
|
|
5,899 |
|
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
322,497 |
|
|
$ |
189,684 |
|
|
$ |
58,459 |
|
|
$ |
570,640 |
|
2004 |
|
|
344,940 |
|
|
|
205,230 |
|
|
|
14,986 |
|
|
|
565,156 |
|
2003 |
|
|
361,206 |
|
|
|
167,747 |
|
|
|
9,964 |
|
|
|
538,917 |
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
5,150 |
|
|
$ |
2,801 |
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
9,224 |
|
2004 |
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
10,790 |
|
2003 |
|
|
5,968 |
|
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
9,934 |
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
2,980 |
|
|
$ |
2,846 |
|
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
|
$ |
8,212 |
|
2004 |
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
5,759 |
|
2003 |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
Number of operating locations at year
end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
2004 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
2003 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
Interest expense and financing costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
17,746 |
|
|
$ |
18,711 |
|
2004 |
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
15,913 |
|
|
|
17,027 |
|
2003 |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
16,614 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
27,024 |
|
|
$ |
(26,655 |
) |
|
$ |
(337 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
2004 |
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
(14,073 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
2003 |
|
|
8,095 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
(7,492 |
) |
|
|
3,539 |
|
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
21. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
49,513 |
|
|
$ |
49,393 |
|
|
$ |
50,746 |
|
Cemetery |
|
$ |
23,597 |
|
|
$ |
26,916 |
|
|
$ |
27,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goods sold |
|
$ |
73,110 |
|
|
$ |
76,309 |
|
|
$ |
78,140 |
|
|
Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
62,696 |
|
|
$ |
63,111 |
|
|
$ |
65,326 |
|
Cemetery |
|
$ |
10,754 |
|
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
|
$ |
11,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services provided |
|
$ |
73,450 |
|
|
$ |
73,585 |
|
|
$ |
76,894 |
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
146,560 |
|
|
$ |
149,894 |
|
|
$ |
155,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
46,375 |
|
|
$ |
46,020 |
|
|
$ |
47,584 |
|
Cemetery |
|
$ |
17,571 |
|
|
$ |
20,165 |
|
|
$ |
21,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
63,946 |
|
|
$ |
66,185 |
|
|
$ |
69,354 |
|
|
Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
36,750 |
|
|
$ |
37,032 |
|
|
$ |
38,078 |
|
Cemetery |
|
$ |
8,259 |
|
|
$ |
8,351 |
|
|
$ |
10,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services provided |
|
$ |
45,009 |
|
|
$ |
45,383 |
|
|
$ |
48,415 |
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
$ |
108,955 |
|
|
$ |
111,568 |
|
|
$ |
117,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
22. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The tables below set forth consolidated operating results by fiscal quarter for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, in thousands, except earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
41,933 |
|
|
$ |
38,024 |
|
|
$ |
36,426 |
|
|
$ |
38,651 |
|
Gross profit from continuing
operations |
|
|
12,230 |
|
|
|
8,737 |
|
|
|
7,940 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(1,137 |
) |
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting method |
|
|
(22,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(23,560 |
) |
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
670 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting method |
|
|
(1.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per basic share
|
|
$ |
(1.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting method |
|
|
(1.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per diluted
share |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
40,304 |
|
|
$ |
37,336 |
|
|
$ |
35,746 |
|
|
$ |
36,508 |
|
Gross profit from continuing
operations |
|
|
11,793 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
8,111 |
|
|
|
9,724 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,661 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
5,884 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,052 |
|
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
|
$ |
5,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per basic share
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per diluted
share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore,
the sum of the quarterly per share amounts does not equal the total computed for the year due
to rounding and stock transactions which occurred during the periods presented. |
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
23. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
The following information is supplemental disclosure as required for the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash paid for interest and financing costs |
|
$ |
14,145 |
|
|
$ |
9,854 |
|
|
$ |
33,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued to directors or officers |
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of available for sale
securities of the funeral and cemetery trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,784 |
|
|
$ |
21,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available for sale securities of the
funeral and cemetery trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,931 |
|
|
$ |
22,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deposits (withdrawals) in trust accounts
increasing (decreasing) noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(878 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carriage Services, Inc.:
We have audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the Consolidated Financial Statements of Carriage Services, Inc. and subsidiaries
for 2005 and 2004 included in this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated March 10,
2006. Our audits for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, were made for the purpose of
forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Part
IV, Item 15 (a)(2) for Carriage Services, Inc. and subsidiaries is the responsibility of the
Companys management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in
our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth
therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
March 10, 2006
66
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Beginning |
|
Costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
Description |
|
of year |
|
Expenses |
|
Deduction |
|
Year |
Year ended December 31, 2003: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for bad debts and contract cancellations |
|
$ |
2,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
$ |
2,235 |
|
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
Litigation reserves |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Environmental remediation reserves |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
Employee severance accruals |
|
$ |
2,345 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
|
|
$ |
1,435 |
|
Office closing and other accruals |
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for bad debts and contract cancellations |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,968 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
Environmental remediation reserves |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
Employee severance accruals |
|
$ |
1,435 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
Office closing and other accruals |
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for bad debts and contract cancellations |
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
2,215 |
|
|
$ |
2,218 |
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
Environmental remediation reserves |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
Employee severance accruals |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Office closing and other accruals |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
67
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that the information required to
be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated
to management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive
and financial officers have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective,
as of December 31, 2005 (the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Managements report on our internal control over financial reporting is presented on page 29 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The report of KPMG LLP relating to managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, the Consolidated Financial Statements and the financial statement
schedule are presented on pages 30, 31 and 66, respectively, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management report on internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31,
2005 did not report any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or any
changes in our internal control over financial reporting.
68
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTIORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to its 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy
statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to its 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy
statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act within 120 days after the
end of the last fiscal year.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to its 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy
statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act within 120 days after the
end of the last fiscal year.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to its 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy
statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act within 120 days after the
end of the last fiscal year.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to its 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy
statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act within 120 days after the
end of the last fiscal year.
69
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm are filed as a part of this report on the pages indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
|
|
29 |
|
Attestation of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
30 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
31 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 |
|
|
32 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 |
|
|
33 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 |
|
|
34 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 |
|
|
35 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 |
|
|
36 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
37 |
|
(a) 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following Financial Statement Schedule and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule are included in this report on the pages indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule |
|
|
66 |
|
Financial Statement Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
67 |
|
All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information
is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements or related notes.
(a) 3 EXHIBITS
The exhibits to this report have been included only with the copies of this report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of individual exhibits will be furnished to
stockholders upon written request to Carriage Services, Inc. and payment of a reasonable fee.
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as
amended, of the Company. Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment dated May 7, 1997. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended September
30, 1997. |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment dated May 7, 2002. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2002. |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation of the Companys Series G Junior
Participating Preferred Stock. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit C to the Rights Agreement with American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company dated December 18, 2000, which is
attached as Exhibit 1 to the Companys Form 8-A filed
December 29, 2000. |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-05545). |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Amendments to the Bylaws of the Company effective December
18, 2000. Incorporated by |
70
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its year ended
December 31, 2001. |
|
4.1
|
|
Certificate of Trust of Carriage Services Capital Trust.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Companys
Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Carriage
Services Capital Trust, dated June 3, 1999 among the
Company, Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington Trust
Company, and Mark W. Duffey, Thomas C. Livengood and Terry
E. Sanford. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
the Companys Form S-3 Registration Statement No.
333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture for the Convertible Junior Subordinated
Debentures due 2029 dated June 3, 1999 between the Company
and Wilmington Trust Company. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.8 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Carriage Services Capital Trust 7% Convertible
Preferred Securities. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Form of the Companys Convertible Junior Subordinated
Debentures due 2029. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Preferred Securities Guarantee dated June 3, 1999 between
the Company and Wilmington Trust Company. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Companys Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Common Securities Guarantee, dated June 3, 1999 by Carriage
Services, Inc. as Guarantor. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Declaration of
Trust of Carriage Services Capital Trust. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Companys Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Rights Agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company dated December 18, 2000. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 1 to the Companys Form 8-A filed December 29,
2000. |
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Indenture dated as of January 27, 2005 between Carriage
Services, Inc., the Guarantors named therein, as
Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated January
27, 2005. |
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 27, 2005
between Carriage Services, Inc., the Guarantors named
therein, and the Initial Purchasers named herein.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys current report on Form 8-K dated Janury 27, 2005. |
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Credit Agreement dated April 27, 2005 among Carriage
Services, Inc., as the Borrower, Bank of
America, N.A. as the Administrative Agent, Swing Line
Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank of Texas, National
Association, as Syndication Agent and Other Lenders.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2005. |
71
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
4.13
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2005 among
Carriage Services, Inc., as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A. as
the Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells
Fargo Bank of Texas, National Association, as Syndication Agent and
Other Lenders. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to 1996 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 333-85961. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Companys 2005
Schedule 14A. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys 2000
Schedule 14A. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan for Consultants. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement
No. 333-62593. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Companys 2005
Schedule 14A. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Employment Agreement with Melvin C. Payne, dated November 8, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Melvin C. Payne dated December 18, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Mark F. Wilson dated December 18, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Ronald A. Erickson dated December 18,
2000. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31,
2000. |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Vincent D. Foster dated December 18, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Employment Agreement with George J. Klug dated May 7, 2002.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Joe R. Davis dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Joseph Saporito dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
72
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.15
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with James J. Benard dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with George J. Klug dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Employment Agreement with James J. Benard dated January 1, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Employment Agreement with George J. Klug dated March 30, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended March 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
*10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement with Joseph Saporito dated November 4, 2005. |
|
|
|
*12
|
|
Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Carriages Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics is available on the website
www.carriageservices.com. |
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Preferability letter from registered public accounting firm
regarding change in accounting method dated August 1, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
*21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
|
|
*23.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Melvin C. Payne in
satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Joseph Saporito in
satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Melvin C. Payne and
Joseph Saporito in satisfaction of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(*) Filed herewith. |
|
( ) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto. |
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE
REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED
ON MARCH 10, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ Melvin C. Payne
Melvin C. Payne
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph Saporito
Joseph Saporito
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and
Secretary (Principal Financial
Officer)
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terry E. Sanford
Terry E. Sanford
|
|
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Accounting
Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joe R. Davis
Joe R. Davis
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald A. Erickson
Ronald A. Erickson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent D. Foster
Vincent D. Foster
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark E. Wilson
Mark E. Wilson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
74
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as
amended, of the Company. Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment dated May 7, 1997. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended September
30, 1997. |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment dated May 7, 2002. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2002. |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation of the Companys Series G Junior
Participating Preferred Stock. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit C to the Rights Agreement with American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company dated December 18, 2000, which is
attached as Exhibit 1 to the Companys Form 8-A filed
December 29, 2000. |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-05545). |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Amendments to the Bylaws of the Company effective December
18, 2000. Incorporated by |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its year ended
December 31, 2001. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Certificate of Trust of Carriage Services Capital Trust.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Companys
Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Carriage
Services Capital Trust, dated June 3, 1999 among the
Company, Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington Trust
Company, and Mark W. Duffey, Thomas C. Livengood and Terry
E. Sanford. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
the Companys Form S-3 Registration Statement No.
333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture for the Convertible Junior Subordinated
Debentures due 2029 dated June 3, 1999 between the Company
and Wilmington Trust Company. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.8 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Carriage Services Capital Trust 7% Convertible
Preferred Securities. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Form of the Companys Convertible Junior Subordinated
Debentures due 2029. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Preferred Securities Guarantee dated June 3, 1999 between
the Company and Wilmington Trust Company. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Companys Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Common Securities Guarantee, dated June 3, 1999 by Carriage
Services, Inc. as Guarantor. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 to the Companys Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Declaration of
Trust of Carriage Services Capital Trust. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Companys Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-84141. |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Rights Agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company dated December 18, 2000. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 1 to the Companys Form 8-A filed December 29,
2000. |
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Indenture dated as of January 27, 2005 between Carriage
Services, Inc., the Guarantors named therein, as
Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to the Companys current report on Form 8-K dated January
27, 2005. |
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 27, 2005
between Carriage Services, Inc., the Guarantors named
therein, and the Initial Purchasers named herein.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys current report on Form 8-K dated Janury 27, 2005. |
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Credit Agreement dated April 27, 2005 among Carriage
Services, Inc., as the Borrower, Bank of
America, N.A. as the Administrative Agent, Swing Line
Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank of Texas, National
Association, as Syndication Agent and Other Lenders.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
4.13
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2005 among
Carriage Services, Inc., as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A. as
the Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells
Fargo Bank of Texas, National Association, as Syndication Agent and
Other Lenders. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to 1996 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 333-85961. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Companys 2005
Schedule 14A. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys 2000
Schedule 14A. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan for Consultants. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement
No. 333-62593. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Companys 2005
Schedule 14A. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Employment Agreement with Melvin C. Payne, dated November 8, 1999.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Melvin C. Payne dated December 18, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Mark F. Wilson dated December 18, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Ronald A. Erickson dated December 18,
2000. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31,
2000. |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Vincent D. Foster dated December 18, 2000.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Employment Agreement with George J. Klug dated May 7, 2002.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Joe R. Davis dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with Joseph Saporito dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.15
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with James J. Benard dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Indemnity Agreement with George J. Klug dated May 13, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2003. |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Employment Agreement with James J. Benard dated January 1, 2004.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Employment Agreement with George J. Klug dated March 30, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended March 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
*10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement with Joseph Saporito dated November 4, 2005. |
|
|
|
*12
|
|
Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Carriages Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics is available on the website
www.carriageservices.com. |
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Preferability letter from registered public accounting firm
regarding change in accounting method dated August 1, 2005.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ended June 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
*21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
|
|
*23.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Melvin C. Payne in
satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Joseph Saporito in
satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Melvin C. Payne and
Joseph Saporito in satisfaction of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(*) Filed herewith.
() Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto.
exv10w19
Exhibit 10.19
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, dated November 4, 2005, is between CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), and JOSEPH SAPORITO, a resident of Harris County, Texas (the
Employee).
1. Employment Term. The Company hereby continues the employment of the Employee for a
term commencing as of the date first above written and, subject to earlier termination as provided
in Section 7 hereof, continuing until September 30, 2010 (such term being herein referred to as the
term of this Agreement). The Employee agrees to accept such employment and to perform the
services specified herein, all upon the terms and conditions hereinafter stated.
2. Duties. The Employee shall serve the Company and shall report to, and be subject
to the general direction and control of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Employee
shall perform the management and administrative duties of Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company. The Employee shall also serve as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of any subsidiary of the Company as requested by the Company, and the
Employee shall perform such other duties as are from time to time assigned to him by the Chief
Executive Officer as are not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
3. Extent of Service. The Employee shall devote his full business time and attention
to the business of the Company, and, except as may be specifically permitted by the Company, shall
not be engaged in any other business activity during the term of this Agreement. The foregoing
shall not be construed as preventing the Employee from making passive investments in other
businesses or enterprises, provided, however, that such investments will not require services on
the part of the Employee which would in any way impair the performance of his duties under this
Agreement.
4. Compensation. During the term of this Agreement, the Company shall pay the
Employee a salary of $22,500.00 per full calendar month of service completed, appropriately
prorated for partial months at the commencement and end of the term of this Agreement. The
Employees salary and benefits will be reviewed annually, but any change therein shall remain in
the sole discretion of the Company, acting through the Compensation Committee of its Board of
Directors. The salary set forth herein shall be payable in bi-weekly installments in accordance
with the payroll policies of the Company in effect from time to time during the term of this
Agreement. The Company shall have the right to deduct from any payment of all compensation to the
Employee hereunder (x) any federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld with
respect to such payments, and (y) any other amounts specifically authorized to be withheld or
deducted by the Employee.
5. Benefits. In addition to the base salary under Section 4, the Employee shall be
entitled to participate in the following benefits during the term of this Agreement:
(i) Consideration for an annual performance-based bonus within the sole discretion of
the Company, as may be recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors, with a
maximum bonus target of 50% of base salary.
(ii) Eligibility for consideration of incentive stock options or stock grants under the
terms of one or more of the Companys incentive plans.
(iii) Four weeks of paid vacation in each calendar year, subject to the Companys
personnel policies respecting such matters.
(iv) Participation in the Companys group health and hospitalization program, and
inclusion in such other employee benefits, as are available generally to executive-level
employees of the Company.
6. Certain Additional Matters. The Employee agrees that at all times during the term
of this Agreement and for a period of two years following any cessation of employment with the
Company:
(a) The Employee will not knowingly or intentionally do or say any act or thing which
will or may impair, damage or destroy the goodwill and esteem for the Company of its
suppliers, employees, patrons, customers and others who may at any time have or have had
business relations with the Company.
(b) The Employee will not reveal to any third person any difference of opinion, if
there be such at any time, between him and the management of the Company as to its
personnel, policies or practices.
(c) The Employee will not knowingly or intentionally do any act or thing detrimental to
the Company or its business.
7. Termination.
(a) Death. If the Employee dies during the term of this Agreement and while in
the employ of the Company, this Agreement shall automatically terminate and the Company
shall have no further obligation to the Employee or his estate except that the Company shall
pay the Employees estate that portion of the Employees base salary under Section 4 accrued
through the date on which the Employees death occurred. Such payment of base salary to the
Employees estate shall be made in the same manner and at the same times as they would have
been paid to the Employee had he not died.
(b) Disability. If during the term of this Agreement, the Employee shall be
prevented from performing his duties hereunder by reason of disability, and such disability
shall continue for a period of six months, then the Company may terminate this Agreement at
any time after the expiration of such six-month period. For purposes of this Agreement, the
Employee shall be deemed to have become disabled when the Company, upon the advice of a
qualified physician, shall have determined that the Employee has become physically or
-2-
mentally incapable (excluding infrequent and temporary absences due to ordinary illness)
of performing his duties under this Agreement. In the event of a termination pursuant to
this paragraph (b), the Company shall be relieved of all its obligations under this
Agreement, except that the Company shall pay to the Employee (or his estate in the event of
his subsequent death) the Employees base salary under Section 4 through the date on which
such termination shall have occurred, reduced during such period by the amount of any
benefits received under any disability policy maintained by the Company. All such payments
to the Employee or his estate shall be made in the same manner and at the same times as they
would have been paid to the Employee had he not become disabled.
(c) Discharge for Cause. Prior to the end of the term of this Agreement, the
Company may discharge the Employee for Cause and terminate this Agreement. In such case
this Agreement shall automatically terminate and the Company shall have no further
obligation to the Employee or his estate other than to pay to the Employee (or his estate in
the event of his subsequent death) that portion of the Employees salary accrued through the
date of termination. For purposes of this Agreement, the Company shall have Cause to
discharge the Employee or terminate the Employees employment hereunder upon (i) the
Employees commission of any felony or any other crime involving moral turpitude, (ii) the
Employees failure or refusal to perform all of his duties, obligations and agreements
herein contained or imposed by law, including his fiduciary duties, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Company, (iii) the Employees commission of acts amounting to gross
negligence or willful misconduct to the material detriment of the Company, or (iv) the
Employees breach of any provision of this Agreement or uniformly applied provisions of the
Companys employee handbook or other personnel policies, including without limitation, its
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
(d) Discharge Without Cause. Prior to the end of the term of this Agreement,
the Company may discharge the Employee without Cause (as defined in paragraph (c) above) and
terminate this Agreement. In such case this Agreement shall automatically terminate and the
Company shall have no further obligation to the Employee or his estate, except that the
Company shall continue to pay to the Employee (or his estate in the event of his subsequent
death) the Employees base salary under Section 4, and shall (if Employee is then eligible
to elect continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
(COBRA) and properly elects such coverage) pay on the Employees behalf the premiums under
COBRA for the Companys group health and hospitalization insurance coverage then in effect,
in each case for a period of twelve months following the date of discharge, except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (e) below. All such payments to the Employee or his estate
shall be made in the same manner and at the same times as they would have been paid to the
Employee had he not been discharged.
(e) Corporate Change. If there occurs a Corporate Change (as defined in the
Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan), then the Employee may thereafter voluntarily resign his
employment hereunder, and in such event, or in case of a discharge without Cause following a
Corporate Change, in either case during the term of this Agreement, then this Agreement
shall automatically terminate and the Company shall have no further obligation to
-3-
the Employee or his estate, except that the Company shall continue to pay to the
Employee (or his estate in the event of his subsequent death) the Employees base salary
under Section 4, and shall (if Employee is then eligible to elect continuation coverage
under COBRA and properly elects such coverage) pay on the Employees behalf the premiums
under COBRA for the Companys group health and hospitalization insurance coverage then in
effect, in each case for a period of twelve months following the date of discharge, or until
expiration of the term of this Agreement (whichever is longer). All such payments to the
Employee or his estate shall be made in the same manner and at the same times as they would
have been paid to the Employee had he not resigned or been discharged. As a condition to
making any such payments under this paragraph (e) or paragraph (d) above, the Employee shall
execute and deliver to the Company the Employees release of all claims against the Company
and its affiliates, other than the right to receive such payments, in form and substance
reasonably acceptable to the Company. No such voluntary resignation, nor any discharge
hereunder, whether or not following a Corporate Change, will relieve the Employee of his
obligations under Sections 6, 8 and 9 hereunder.
8. Restrictive Covenants. The Employee acknowledges that in the course of his
employment with the Company as a member of the Companys senior executive and management team, he
will have access to confidential and proprietary business information of the Company and its
affiliates, and will develop through such employment business systems, methods of doing business,
and contacts within the death care industry, all of which will help to identify him with the
business and goodwill of the Company. Consequently, it is important that the Company protect its
interests in regard to such matters from unfair competition. The parties therefore agree that for
so long as the Employee shall remain employed by the Company and, if the employment of the Employee
ceases for any reason (including voluntary resignation), then for a period of two (2) years
thereafter, the Employee shall not, directly or indirectly:
(i) alone or for his own account, or as a officer, director, shareholder, partner,
member, trustee, employee, consultant, advisor, agent or any other capacity of any
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other business organization or entity,
encourage, support, finance, be engaged in, interested in, or concerned with (x) any of the
companies and entities described on Schedule I hereto, except to the extent that any
activities in connection therewith are confined exclusively outside the Continental United
States, or (y) any other business within the death care industry having an office or being
conducted within a radius of fifty (50) miles of any funeral home, cemetery or other death
care business owned or operated by the Company or any of its subsidiaries at the time of
such termination;
(ii) induce or assist anyone in inducing in any way any employee of the Company or any
of its subsidiaries to resign or sever his or her employment or to breach an employment
contract with the Company or any such subsidiary; or
(iii) own, manage, advise, encourage, support, finance, operate, join, control, or
participate in the ownership, management, operation, or control of or be connected in any
manner with any business which is or may be in the funeral, mortuary, crematory, cemetery or
burial insurance business or in any business related thereto (x) as part of any of the
-4-
companies or entities listed on Schedule I, or (y) otherwise within a radius of fifty
(50) miles of any funeral home, cemetery or other death care business owned or operated by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries at the time of such termination.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above covenants shall not prohibit the passive ownership of
not more than one percent (1%) of the outstanding voting securities of any entity within the death
care industry. The foregoing covenants shall not be held invalid or unenforceable because of the
scope of the territory or actions subject hereto or restricted hereby, or the period of time within
which such covenants respectively are operative, but the maximum territory, the action subject to
such covenants and the period of time they are enforceable are subject to any determination by a
final judgment of any court which has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter.
9. Confidential Information. The Employee acknowledges that in the course of his
employment by the Company he will receive certain trade secrets, management methods, financial and
accounting data (including but not limited to reports, studies, analyses, spreadsheets and other
materials and information), operating techniques, prospective acquisitions, employee lists,
training manuals and procedures, personnel evaluation procedures, and other confidential
information and knowledge concerning the business of the Company and its affiliates (hereinafter
collectively referred to as Information) which the Company desires to protect. The Employee
understands that the Information is confidential and he agrees not to reveal the Information to
anyone outside the Company so long as the confidential or secret nature of the Information shall
continue. The Employee further agrees that he will at no time use the Information in competing
with the Company. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Employee shall surrender to the Company
all papers, documents, writings and other property produced by his or coming into his possession by
or through his employment or relating to the Information and the Employee agrees that all such
materials will at all times remain the property of the Company.
10. Remedies. The parties recognize that the services to be rendered under this
Agreement by the Employee are special, unique, and of extraordinary character, and that in the
event of the breach by the Employee of the covenants contained in Section 8 or Section 9 hereof,
the Company may suffer irreparable harm as a result. The parties therefore agree that, in the
event of any breach or threatened breach of any of such covenants, the Company shall be entitled to
specific performance or injunctive relief, or both, and may, in addition to and not in lieu of any
claim or proceeding for damages, institute and prosecute proceedings in any court of competent
jurisdiction to enforce through injunctive relief such covenants. In addition, the Company may, if
it so elects, suspend (if applicable) any payments due under this Agreement pending any such breach
and offset against any future payments the amount of the Companys damages arising from any such
breach. The Employee agrees to waive and hereby waives any requirement for the Company to secure
any bond in connection with the obtaining of such injunction or other equitable relief.
11. Notices. All notices, requests, consents and other communications under this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date personally
delivered or three business days after the date mailed, postage prepaid, by certified mail, return
receipt requested, or when sent by telex or telecopy and receipt is confirmed, if addressed to the
respective parties as follows:
-5-
|
|
|
If to the Employee:
|
|
Mr. Joseph Saporito |
|
|
P. O. Box 27591
Houston, TX 77227-7591 |
|
|
|
If to the Company:
|
|
Carriage Services, Inc. |
|
|
3040 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 300 |
|
|
Houston, Texas 77056 |
|
|
Attn: Chief Executive Officer |
Either party hereto may designate a different address by providing written notice of such new
address to the other party hereto.
12. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be
interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law but if any provision
of this Agreement shall be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be
ineffective to the extent of such provision or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of
such provision or the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
13. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by the Employee. Neither the
Employee nor his estate shall have any right to commute, encumber or dispose of any right to
receive payments hereunder, it being agreed that such payments and the right thereto are
nonassignable and nontransferable.
14. Binding Effect. Subject to the provisions of Section 13 of this Agreement, this
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, the Employees
heirs and personal representatives, and the successors and assigns of the Company.
15. Captions. The section and paragraph headings in this Agreement are for reference
purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
16. Complete Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the
parties concerning the subject hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and arrangements between
the parties concerning the subject thereof. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this
Agreement supersedes and replaces the Employment Agreement between the parties dated September 16,
2002. This Agreement does not affect or impair any provisions of the Companys employee handbook,
personnel policies or Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, all of which shall remain binding on the
Employee.
17. Governing Law; Venue. A substantial portion of the Employees duties under this
Agreement shall be performed at the Companys corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, and this
Agreement has been substantially negotiated and is being executed and delivered in the State of
Texas. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws
of the State of Texas. Any suit, claim or proceeding arising under or in connection with this
Agreement or the employment relationship evidenced hereby must be brought, if at all, in a state
-6-
district court in Harris County, Texas or federal district court in the Southern District of
Texas, Houston Division. Each party submits to the jurisdiction of such courts and agrees not to
raise any objection to such jurisdiction.
18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple original counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year
first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MELVIN C. PAYNE, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph Saporito |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOSEPH SAPORITO |
|
|
-7-
SCHEDULE I
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(JOSEPH SAPORITO, III)
1. |
|
The following entities, together with all Affiliates thereof: |
Service Corporation International
Alderwoods Group, Inc.
Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
Keystone North America, Inc.
Meridian Mortuary Group, Inc.
StoneMor Partners LP
Saber Management LLC
Thomas Pierce & Co.
|
|
For purposes of the foregoing, an Affiliate of an entity is a person that directly or
indirectly controls, is under the control of or is under common control with such entity. |
|
2. |
|
Any new entity which may hereafter be established which acquires any combination of ten or
more funeral homes and/or cemeteries from any of the entities described in 1 above. |
|
3. |
|
Any funeral home, cemetery or other death care enterprise which is managed by any entity
described in 1 or 2 above. |
exv12
EXHIBIT 12
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(unaudited and in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Fixed charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
19,372 |
|
|
$ |
18,336 |
|
|
$ |
16,946 |
|
|
$ |
16,103 |
|
|
$ |
24,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of capitalized
expenses related to debt |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Rental expense factor |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges before
capitalized interest and
preferred stock dividends |
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
21,208 |
|
|
|
19,121 |
|
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
26,912 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges |
|
|
22,080 |
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
19,252 |
|
|
|
18,259 |
|
|
|
26,958 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges
plus preferred dividends |
|
$ |
22,126 |
|
|
$ |
21,392 |
|
|
$ |
19,252 |
|
|
$ |
18,259 |
|
|
$ |
26,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available for fixed charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and cumulative effect of change
in accounting
principle |
|
$ |
9,894 |
|
|
$ |
11,230 |
|
|
$ |
9,438 |
|
|
$ |
11,079 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
Add fixed charges before
capitalized interest and
preferred stock dividends |
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
21,208 |
|
|
|
19,121 |
|
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
26,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings available
for fixed charges |
|
$ |
31,676 |
|
|
$ |
32,438 |
|
|
$ |
28,559 |
|
|
$ |
29,314 |
|
|
$ |
26,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1) |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
plus dividends (1) |
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) For purposes of computing the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and earnings to fixed charges
plus dividends: (i) earnings consist of income from continuing operations before provision for
income taxes plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest) and (ii) fixed charges consist
of interest expensed and capitalized, amortization of debt discount and expense relating to
indebtedness and the portion of rental expense representative of the interest factor attributable
to leases for rental property. There were no dividends paid or accrued on the Companys Common
Stock during the periods presented above.
exv21w1
EXHIBIT 21.1
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
JURISDICTION OF |
NAME |
|
INCORPORATION |
Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
CFS Funeral Services, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Funeral Services of Michigan, Inc.
|
|
Michigan |
Carriage Funeral Services of Kentucky, Inc.
|
|
Kentucky |
Carriage Funeral Services of California, Inc.
|
|
California |
Carriage Funeral Services of Idaho, Inc.
|
|
Idaho |
Wilson & Kratzer Mortuaries
|
|
California |
Rolling Hills Memorial Park
|
|
California |
Carriage Services of Connecticut, Inc.
|
|
Connecticut |
CSI Funeral Services of Massachusetts, Inc.
|
|
Massachusetts |
CHC Insurance Agency of Ohio, Inc.
|
|
Ohio |
Barnett, Demrow & Ernst, Inc.
|
|
Kentucky |
Carriage Services of New Mexico, Inc.
|
|
New Mexico |
Forastiere Family Funeral Services, Inc.
|
|
Massachusetts |
Carriage Cemetery Services, Inc.
|
|
Texas |
Carriage Services of Oklahoma, L.L.C.
|
|
Oklahoma |
Carriage Services of Nevada, Inc.
|
|
Nevada |
Hubbard Funeral Home, Inc.
|
|
Maryland |
Carriage Services Capital Trust
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Team California (Cemetery), LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Team California (Funeral), LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Team Florida (Cemetery), LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Team Florida (Funeral), LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Services of Ohio, LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Team Kansas, LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Municipal Cemetery Services of Nevada, Inc.
|
|
Nevada |
Carriage Cemetery Services of California, Inc.
|
|
California |
Carriage Insurance Agency of Massachusetts, Inc.
|
|
Massachusetts |
Carriage Internet Strategies, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Investments, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Management, L.P.
|
|
Texas |
Cochranes Chapel of the Roses, Inc.
|
|
California |
Horizon Cremation Society, Inc.
|
|
California |
Carriage Life Events, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Merger I, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Merger II, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Merger III, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Carriage Merger IV, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
exv23w1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carriage Services, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed registration statements (No.
333-11435, 333-49053, and 333-62593) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-71902)
on Form S-3 of Carriage Services, Inc. (the Company) of our reports dated March 10, 2006, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash
flows, and the related financial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of the
Company. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for preneed selling costs in
2005.
/s/KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
March 10, 2006
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
I, Melvin C. Payne, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carriage Services Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a. |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b. |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c. |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d. |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions): |
|
a. |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b. |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 10, 2006 |
|
/s/ Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Joseph Saporito, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carriage Services Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this annual report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a. |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b. |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c. |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d. |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a. |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
b. |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 10, 2006 |
|
/s/ Joseph Saporito |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Saporito |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32
EXHIBIT 32
In connection with the Annual Report of Carriage Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (Form 10-K), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
to the best of such officers knowledge: (i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Carriage Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melvin C. Payne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph Saporito |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Saporito |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|